archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Design a Better Boston

Design a Better Boston Are you disappointed with the state of Boston's current architecture/development? Think you have a better idea? Post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2017, 05:36 PM   #41
Joel N. Weber II
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 562
Re: Partial Cloverleaf Interchanges: US-1 / I-495

One interchange that I think would probably benefit from the partial cloverleaf configuration is the US-1 / I-495 interchange in Plainville: delete the existing I-495 westbound to US-1 southbound ~270 degree loop (and the I-495 eastbound to US-1 northbound loop).

Counting the southbound lanes of US-1 from right to left, assuming 3 southbound lanes immediately south of Madison St, lane 1 would then go to I-495 westbound only, lane 2 to I-495 eastbound only, lane 3 would continue on US-1 to the south (possibly also with an option to get on to I-495 eastbound after events at Foxboro Stadium), and lane 4 would collect traffic from I-495 westbound continuing to US-1.

I'm also wondering whether permanently reconfiguring US-1 from Foxboro Stadium to I-495 to be one lane northbound, three lanes southbound would make sense, if it only sees high traffic volumes right after major events at the stadium.
Joel N. Weber II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 05:46 PM   #42
Joel N. Weber II
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 562
Re: Congestion Tolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
You can't toll your old interstates
While the current federal rules don't allow old Interstate highways to be tolled, there's no reason Senator Warren, Senator Markey, Representative Capuano, their colleagues, and the President couldn't change those rules.

Do we have land to widen I-93 if we get the magic Public Private Partnership funding?
Joel N. Weber II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 06:00 PM   #43
Joel N. Weber II
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 562
Re: Woburn I-93 / I-95 interchange

Does building a flyover ramp to allow direct I-93 southbound to I-95 eastbound / northbound movements make sense at all?

Highway 129 provides a much more direct route than the freeway routing.

One might imagine a tunnel under 129 for the I-93 southbound to I-95 eastbound / northbound traffic, but that tunnel is probably not going to reach the top of anyone's priority list for many decades.

But would it be possible to send the I-93 southbound to I-95 eastbound / northbound traffic along the Haverhill Line right of way while still maintaining space for two Orange Line tracks if the Orange Line to Reading conversion happens, and then build an I-93 northbound to I-95 westbound / southbound flyover ramp at the existing interchange location? (Presumably this would involve grade separating the Orange Line / freeway connector through the center of Reading.)
Joel N. Weber II is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neat Photos of Boston highways Kahta Transit and Infrastructure 0 05-10-2012 10:00 PM
With Road Trains, Highways Become Public Transportation kennedy General Architecture & Urban Planning 6 11-11-2009 11:15 AM
Tufts researchers study health risks highways may pose in neighborhoods vanshnookenraggen General 5 04-15-2009 09:44 AM
Manchester's Downtown is Expanded M. Brown Greater New England 0 06-11-2008 03:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.