![]() |
|
|||||||
| Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 453
|
Just curious to read some of your ideas. Both short term and long term plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 5,965
|
One of the T's biggest problems financially is its union employees and their massive benefits. Finding creative ways to reduce the number of these would help substantially.
But is there a point? The T will never be run at a profit, and the state will just roll up the savings and allocate them to other agencies, use them to balance its budget, or cut taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 548
|
Build stations with more integrated retail/food space. Maybe expand foot tunnels a la Montreal Undergound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Marblehead & Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,820
|
Introduce legislation barring collective bargaining, so that jobs and pay are based on merit. Stop discretionary spending for a few years. Invest in automated stations and cut jobs which are served by automatic systems.
Either that, or privatize the entire system much in the way utilities are privatized. Require the owner to receive government approval for rate hikes, etc.
__________________
A blog I started with a few friends: The Bureau |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,528
|
The system should be a tax-supported utility, like the Fire Department or Police.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,028
|
Find a way to get a $1billion "gift" in the next military spending bill. Nobody will notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orient Heights
Posts: 3,133
|
^ That's a start, ablarc.
An independent audit of all positions should be conducted. I wonder how many no-show wage-earners would be uncovered... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 271
|
Union Busting is a good start in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 861
|
I think the MBTA is a prime example of how a Union can weigh a business, or entity down.
What percentage of MBTA employees belong to a union? Until we see a major shift on Beacon Hill, I think the MBTA will stay the way it is, its main purpose is to employ people. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,758
|
Quote:
You don't want to know. Truly unspeakable things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,758
|
Seriously though, how about a controlled bankruptcy a la GM? Rip up the union contracts and start from scratch. End the 23 and done policy. Remove the driver from the second car on the green line and move to a true POP system. Integrate the MBTA police into a division of the state police. No more expansion without clear cut plans on how to pay AND maintain it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Marblehead & Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,820
|
I like palindrome's ideas.
__________________
A blog I started with a few friends: The Bureau |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 453
|
The point is that if the T became profitable for the state, they could pump even more money into repairs/maintancence and expansion projects because they would be able to give the excess money to other agencies or give some money back to taxpayers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 5,965
|
Transit is never going to be profitable if you want to keep it as available as it is now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Marblehead & Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,820
|
All forums on the internet have trolls.
Um, transit should absolutely be profitable if the state can find a way to make it so. Create a product that people want will go a long way to attracting new customers who want to use transit as a choice, not because it is a necessity.
__________________
A blog I started with a few friends: The Bureau |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 5,965
|
Um, the only time transit was ever profitable was when it was a necessity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Marblehead & Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,820
|
Make transit preferable to the car. Then it will be profitable because people will choose it over personal transportation.
__________________
A blog I started with a few friends: The Bureau |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two Financial Center | kz1000ps | New Development | 208 | 03-02-2013 06:41 PM |
| Boston ranked 9th in world's leading financial global centers | Oakley | General | 12 | 11-06-2009 10:36 PM |
| Sad day in the Financial District | czsz | General | 23 | 03-20-2009 06:45 PM |
| Financial crisis begins assault on local culture: Brandeis museum closing | czsz | General | 8 | 01-28-2009 04:51 PM |
| Financial crisis -> a more modest architecture? | czsz | General Architecture & Urban Planning | 1 | 12-01-2008 07:36 PM |