archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > The Archives > 2009 archBOSTON Awards > The 2009 Awards Nominations & Discussion

The 2009 Awards Nominations & Discussion The Best and Worst of Boston's Built Environment in 2009

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2009, 12:50 PM   #1
briv
Administrator
 
briv's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,083
Send a message via AIM to briv
Worst New Development of 2009

All members are encouraged to nominate a Boston area project* completed in 2009 that they believe is deserving of special recognition for its negative impact on the built environment.

Last Year's Winner: The Rose Kennedy Greenway


*includes all project types, i.e., building, park, infrastructure project, etc.
briv is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 10:23 PM   #2
Shepard
Senior Member
 
Shepard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,304
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Korean Church in Brookline Village

Shepard is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 10:40 PM   #3
Shepard
Senior Member
 
Shepard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,304
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Also, the Louis Boston pavilion-in-a-field on Fan Pier
Shepard is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 11:18 PM   #4
Ron Newman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Davis Square, Somerville, MA
Posts: 8,399
Send a message via AIM to Ron Newman
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Doesn't qualify because not "completed in 2009".
Ron Newman is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 08:41 AM   #5
cden4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,011
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Korean Church in Brookline
cden4 is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 01:51 PM   #6
kennedy
Senior Member
 
kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,824
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Will it be finished in time? I nominated it on the Worst New Proposal thread.

How about Mandarin Oriental? Or maybe One Marina Park at Fan Pier? I guess that's not finished either.

You know it's a bad year when you struggle to think of the worst developments.
kennedy is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 02:35 PM   #7
unterbau
Senior Member
 
unterbau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 548
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

If there aren't any specifically bad developments completed this year, maybe there should be a poll option for 'None'
unterbau is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:18 PM   #8
DZH22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,121
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

I think the greenway has been getting kind of a bad rap. It really won last year? There are a ton of new trees on it, and give those 5-10 years to grow and fill in a little and it should bring much more of a park feel to it. Different parts of it are also getting a lot of usage. The dancing fountains near the aquarium are incredibly popular in the summer time, and the large plaza by south station and in front of the federal reserve is packed with vendors during lunch time. The bigger problem is whether the city will allow future projects surrounding the greenway to be up to par with the standards we have on this website. I would say early projections are inconclusive, although I'd say overall it will be somewhat of a disappointment. Judging now (or LAST YEAR in this case) is not fair because it is not exactly a finished product out there. Once the recession ends we will see if any of the better projects are allowed to be built because they will determine the full impact of the greenway as much as the park itself. I must say I was driving it at night, coming from Fanueil Hall towards South Station, and the glassy sheens of the Intercontinental and Atlantic Wharf looked very cool/impressive with the Federal Reserve and 1 Financial looming behind them.

For this year I will go with the black wall of 45 Province, the crown of the Clarendon, or the value engineered side of the W. All 3 of these are crap and we were mislead by the renderings.

This is a little off topic but does anybody know what the deal is with the new trend for buildings to have nice looking sides and value engineered crap sides? Why are mishmashed facades becoming the status quo?
DZH22 is offline  
Old 12-22-2009, 08:26 AM   #9
AmericanFolkLegend
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,106
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Quote:
does anybody know what the deal is with the new trend for buildings to have nice looking sides and value engineered crap sides?
One side faces the Back Bay or Beacon Hill and the other (value-engineered) side faces Roxbury? That's kind of the case with the W.
AmericanFolkLegend is offline  
Old 12-22-2009, 04:46 PM   #10
czsz
Senior Member
 
czsz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 6,052
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by DZH22 View Post
I think the greenway has been getting kind of a bad rap. It really won last year? There are a ton of new trees on it, and give those 5-10 years to grow and fill in a little and it should bring much more of a park feel to it. Different parts of it are also getting a lot of usage. The dancing fountains near the aquarium are incredibly popular in the summer time, and the large plaza by south station and in front of the federal reserve is packed with vendors during lunch time. The bigger problem is whether the city will allow future projects surrounding the greenway to be up to par with the standards we have on this website. I would say early projections are inconclusive, although I'd say overall it will be somewhat of a disappointment. Judging now (or LAST YEAR in this case) is not fair because it is not exactly a finished product out there. Once the recession ends we will see if any of the better projects are allowed to be built because they will determine the full impact of the greenway as much as the park itself. I must say I was driving it at night, coming from Fanueil Hall towards South Station, and the glassy sheens of the Intercontinental and Atlantic Wharf looked very cool/impressive with the Federal Reserve and 1 Financial looming behind them.

For this year I will go with the black wall of 45 Province, the crown of the Clarendon, or the value engineered side of the W. All 3 of these are crap and we were mislead by the renderings.

This is a little off topic but does anybody know what the deal is with the new trend for buildings to have nice looking sides and value engineered crap sides? Why are mishmashed facades becoming the status quo?
Has anyone ever defended the Greenway without using the "trees will grow" argument?

Sorry, every time I cross over to the North End in winter and the wind whips across the Greenway I curse it to hell. And this is supposedly the most successful part of it! We have parks in this city that work in winter because they're charming destinations by day and avoidable by night, but the Greenway was supposed to stitch the city back together and has wound up being an even more regrettable scar than what it replaced.

So I nominate the Greenway again. It is an ongoing failure. All attempts to make it better this year have failed.
czsz is offline  
Old 12-22-2009, 11:46 PM   #11
kz1000ps
Senior Member
 
kz1000ps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: man hat tan
Posts: 7,432
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

Is Fan Pier's first building going to be done this year? If so, I wholeheartedly nominate that piece of stinking shit.
__________________
Politicians, ugly buildings and whores all get respectable if they last long enough.
kz1000ps is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 01:44 PM   #12
BarbaricManchurian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 909
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

The Clarendon
BarbaricManchurian is offline  
Old 12-26-2009, 02:43 PM   #13
briv
Administrator
 
briv's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,083
Send a message via AIM to briv
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

This one is easy: One Marina Park Drive.

Alas, the Boston Stump has reached its ultimate nadir. One Marina Park Dr is like the shark of Boston Stumps -- evolutionarily perfect, incapable of being improved upon. It's as if Fallon gathered the world's most brilliant mathematicians together and asked them to come up with the fattest, stumpiest, fat stump geometrically possible and this is what they came up with. Awe-inspiring.
briv is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 10:18 PM   #14
czsz
Senior Member
 
czsz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 6,052
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

^ I think that one is in a whole other category: "Most Implosion-worthy"
czsz is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 12:43 PM   #15
blade_bltz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Peninsula (formerly Brookline)
Posts: 811
Re: Worst New Development of 2009

^^ Fallon's Golden Ratio. With an emphasis on golden.
blade_bltz is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best New Development of 2009 briv The 2009 Awards Nominations & Discussion 34 01-12-2010 09:24 PM
Worst New Development briv 2008 archBOSTON Awards 0 06-06-2009 03:54 PM
Worst New Development Vote briv 2008 Awards Voting & Discussion 19 04-01-2009 09:13 AM
Worst New Development Nominations briv 2008 Awards Nominations & Discussion 3 01-29-2009 02:07 PM
Boston gets vote for worst waterfront development! Java King Boston Architecture & Urbanism 33 06-16-2007 10:26 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.