![]() |
|
|||||||
| New Development New urban and/or architectural developments in Boston metro. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 5,658
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 210
|
WOW, this is excellent news. Since the EPA controls the number of parking spaces downtown, can the rights to create spaces be sold? The buyer could then sell off spaces to other developers, raze the garage, and include underground parking beneath whatever is developed on the site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 322
|
Awesome! This is the ugliest building in town. Now, State Service Center, you're next. :twisted: |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 361
|
Hooray! The article didn't mention tearing it down, but come on! Whoever buys it has got to tear it down and open up Congress Street to the Bulfinch triangle. And reestablish a real Haymarket Sq. Dream dream dream...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 322
|
Aside from whatever gets built, they should strive to bring back the old street grid as much as possible. And a new Haymarket Square would be awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
yay!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Inman Square, Cambridge
Posts: 200
|
This is great news! Lets hope they put it on the chopping block after the auction block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orient Heights
Posts: 3,133
|
This is a better development site for the sort of iconic tower Menino wants to see built in Winthrop Square...More land, better access to public transportation, zero interference from the FAA...If the city wants to seriously court developers to build big (>800'), this is one place to do it (the other, for all the same reasons, is the site of the old Boston Garden)...
Quote:
I know modernism isn't for everyone -- neither is French Second Empire, but I'd never recommend dynamiting Comm. Ave... I'll leave you with this: in 1950, the City of Buffalo bulldozed this -- ![]() ![]() ![]() They replaced it with a parking lot that remains to this day... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 5,658
|
The garage was recently given a spiffy paint job. It gave it sort of a glossy smooth look.
An off-topic question for Beton Brut (Or ablarc, or anyone else): Would painting City Hall like this ruin part of what is considered beautiful about it, that is, the 'rough concrete' look? Would it still be considered an architectual masterpiece in the eyes of those who now proclaim it so? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,588
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,050
|
ya. That would look awkward as literally the last tall building to the north. Well, next to the soaring JFK building
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 233
|
How about a 500-foot tower, like 60 State Street? Maybe tapered, even, say 600-feet tall at the top. sloping down toward the Greenway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 361
|
I think demolishing the garage and building two moderately sized twin towers, say, 20 stories or so, one on each side of Congress St, which form a semicircle on the Bulfinch side to recreate Haymarket Sq, would be super cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South End, Boston
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
|
It's nowhere near Beacon Hill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,050
|
Haha, well the half-mile shadow at 6am would be
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,588
|
Quote:
Anything more would kill the scale.
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orient Heights
Posts: 3,133
|
Quote:
Justin once astutely observed that concrete "records its own history" (check out the board-markings, and even woodgrain in City Hall)...Painting would spoil this... Better, I think, to power-wash, and (possibly) clear-coat with a sealing agent...The extremes of weather and temperature are tougher in Boston than in Los Angeles, one of America's laboratories for concrete buildings... I knew that my suggestion of building tall in this location would be controversial...I look forward to the next few years, and the potential revitalization for the Bulfinch Triangle...This can and should be a vital, 24-hour neighborhood, with housing, restaurants, bars, entertainment, and shopping...There's no reason at all why tall buildings with well-designed street-presence can't co-exist, and dare I say enhance an historic district...I wouldn't put anything over 30-stories fronting on the Greenway, but at the "back" of the site, where the "drum" and elevator-tower of the garage is located, go large -- 75 stories... This isn't unprecedented -- about 20 years ago the Feds killed a plan for a 40+ story hotel on the eastern-most end of City Hall Plaza, replacing the low-rise portion of the JFK Building (this is still a good idea)... I'm all for restoring the old street-grid (including Hanover Street), and opening up the view from State Street to North Station...The Greenway side of the site may also be a good spot for a farmers' market under a glazed canopy, facing the Y (if they ever build it)... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
|
I believe that a tall tower would be good for the area. The Nashua Street Residences are going to start construction in the next year.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,588
|
If the tower was very slender, like that new building they are proposing in Chicago, then I would be all for it. It is the bulky, square towers that seem to be the norm in Boston that would ruin the scale.
Actually, I think Boston would look really cool with a few slender, tall towers. In regards to the Feds, as long as they are in that building nothing good will happen to Gov't Center.
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| brutalism, congress st., garage, government center |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parcel BB (Surface Road between Broad Street and India Street) | PaulC | New Development | 31 | 01-06-2012 12:11 AM |
| A Bigger Garage Under the Common | stellarfun | New Development | 15 | 07-02-2008 11:06 AM |
| Congress St. Garage Community Meeting | briv | Boston Architecture/Urbanism Related Events | 1 | 06-18-2008 06:47 PM |
| Dover Street (Berkeley Street), South End | IMAngry | Existing Development | 9 | 01-27-2007 02:10 PM |
| Southie~ D-Street Condo Development | statler | New Development | 2 | 10-09-2006 10:36 AM |