![]() |
|
|||||||
| New Development New urban and/or architectural developments in Boston metro. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 490
|
Here's a real gem. Starting ripping away!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 245
|
oof ... couldnt put some residential in there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 5,657
|
^^ What and fill in those beautiful parking lots?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 490
|
I love the natural connections it makes between the neighborhood and the river. Also, the fact that it such a pedestrian-friendly design is really nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,585
|
Why the hell isn't this a TOD? This state is all talk, this is a perfect place for a station on the Fairmont Line and the last place we should be building a strip mall, but oh no, the tax payers can't be asked to kick in a few bucks, the developers have to carry the burden.
The catch 22 with TODs is that you can't build them without a station, but the state won't build the station unless there is development. ASININE!
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston's South End
Posts: 254
|
i can't beleive we're still doing this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,319
|
This project seems to be half way between Fairmont Station and Blue Hill Ave Station. This is looks to be the longest section on the line. If there are hearings on this station this would be a good place to find out if a new station is possible.
http://www.mbta.com/uploadedFiles/do...ve_summary.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,756
|
With the amount of "lifestyle centers" under construction right now, and with the way the economy is going, i don't understand why they would be interested in building this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 546
|
I think people believe that this project will do for this stretch of River Street, what the Shaw's did for Lower Mills.
It is a bit off the beaten path and there is very little modern retail in this area. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
Supermarkets are useful, though. Will this plaza be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 310
|
Let's not get too carried away folks. This site may be in Boston, but it's the same distance from downtown as 1950s era subdivisions in Saugus, and there are two existing stations downstream on this line that are littered with vacant lots. If there is demand for TOD, let's see it happen there first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 5,951
|
They're building TOD in Westwood...distance to downtown relative to shit in Saugus is no excuse (especially since the city is in control here vs. some bedroom suburb fighting rearguard action to "protect its identity" or something).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 546
|
Wasn't this project originally residential? I`ll have to look in the archives of the Dorchester Reporter. Also the dam behind this building should be removed in the near future as part of the Neponset River restoration.
Let's be clear, I'm not a big fan of box retail in a sea of parking lots particularly so near a river. It is sad to think this is all that can be built- today. That doesn't mean that these stores won't be wildly successful and this plaza actually help this neighborhood like the one in Hyde/Jackson Square, JP. The next cycle, things will finally be different for this area that once was like Newton and because of ignorance and fear, automobiles, excessive taxation on multi-family dwellings, lead paint- polluted water, and a million other reasons changed virtually over night. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 310
|
^^ Westwood has a couple advantages over this site. The first being there is already a transit station there. As I've noted in other posts, the concept of the state building new infill stations to facilitate TOD development makes no sense given the number of opportunities which exist to build such development around existing stations.
Second--in almost every "TOD neighborhood" outside of Boston's CBD the majority of trips made into and out of the neighborhood are by auto. I think you'll agree that the junction of New England's two most heavily traveled highways being located less than a mile from the Westwood development gives it a bit of an advantage over the corner of River Street and Wood Avenue. The funny thing is that I'd bet big money that the percentage of trips made on transit (work, shopping or home-based trips) is and will be much higher in the 1/2 mile surrounding the proposed 892 River Street big box development than it will be in the Westwood TOD. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parcel BB (Surface Road between Broad Street and India Street) | PaulC | New Development | 31 | 01-06-2012 12:11 AM |
| Charles River Park | DowntownDave | New Development | 202 | 06-28-2010 09:49 PM |
| Hyde Park | PaulC | Existing Development | 1 | 02-10-2009 09:16 PM |
| Hyde Park "Makeover" | statler | New Development | 7 | 04-24-2008 05:52 PM |
| Future of Charles River Park | DowntownDave | General | 1 | 07-18-2006 10:57 AM |