![]() |
|
|||||||
| Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: salem ma and washington dc
Posts: 2,167
|
When are they re-naming Terminal E as Terminal D? And I assume the reconfiguration means passengers no longer will walk in the open air to go between Terminals C & E. From today's Herald.
Quote:
__________________
A man gazing on the stars is at the mercy of the puddles in the road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 154
|
Any improvement will be a good thing. Have they fixed up the gate areas in Terminal E yet? They have a beautiful ticketing area but the actual seating area and arrivals are the pits. I thought they were redoing it all, but the last time I was there, it was still incredibly dated and ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 418
|
My guess is that this is related to an anticipated merger between Northwest and Delta, which would theoretically move Northwest into Terminal A. Massport has been trying to get them to move there since A opened, but Northwest resisted and Massport wound up moving Continental when Delta cut flights. The AirTran move sounds like its into the old Continental gates off the B-C connector that Jet Blue has been using recently.
The "upper level" thing is also misleading. There is an upper level of C above where the AirTran desks are now, but I assume they're actually going in the vacant Continental desks in the main hall, especially with the gates flipping to the other side. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: atlanta
Posts: 597
|
Northwest has resisted moving to Terminal A because being in the International Terminal E allows their international passengers (arrivals/departures to/from Amsterdam) to make easy domestic connections within the same terminal, something that can't happen in Terminal A. As I mentioned before in the Logan Flight Additions thread, Delta's original plans for their new Terminal A included space for Customs/INS facilities allowing for expansion of their Transatlantic routes out of Boston (and easy domestic connections within their own terminal) but MassPort nixed the idea. As far as the upstairs departures area of Terminal E, they do have new seating but I agree with ChunkyMonkey, it's very dated. They need to jazz it up...maybe have banners hanging from the ceiling, new flooring, add some color!!. The ticketing area downstairs, however, is beautiful! The Northwest domestic area is pretty nice as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 885
|
Massport is dropping the ball on some things if you ask me, namely the lack of Customs in terminal A. Look at it this way, they could move Northwest over to A
and make them happy by allowing passengers to connect to their domestic flights. One thing to point out is that these flights are pretty much all Boston originating or ending passengers. Northwest funnels the bulk of their Amsterdam passengers through Detroit as they have 5 daily flights and Minneapolis/St.Paul. Delta is the carrier with a decent sized network that would benefit the most from the facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
Northwest should be kicked out of Terminal E. They are enjoying cheap rates as they have been there forever. I believe 2009 will be the last year of their lease in Terminal E. They really should be in Terminal A with Delta and Continental. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: atlanta
Posts: 597
|
You might be correct about TACA but it was MassPort (confirmed by several very senior Delta executives) who insisted that ALL arriving flights that require customs/INS services have to arrive at Terminal E though those same departing flights could depart from any terminal. Even Delta's CEO at the time, Leo Mullins, flew up to Boston to add his weight to the discussions but MassPort held firm. Seriously, if the Feds put a halt to an increase in European flights because of a lack of INS/Customs manpower the Mass Congressional Delegation and the Governor himself would have raised hell. Delta wanted all it's passengers to have the convenience of not having to leave it's terminal to make international/domestic connections. JFK, I believe, has 5 terminals with customs/INS, including Delta's terminal and American's newly constructed terminal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 154
|
If that is so, then I hope they at least had the insight to create some possibility of adding INS/customs in A for the future. I know AA was planning to add FIS in Terminal B before 9/11 ended its plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 885
|
Quote:
How much space is there realy in terminal A for 3 airlines to operate out of. Given that Northwest sends an A330-300 daily to Amsterdam, the 330 would take up quite a bit of space over there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 154
|
I think it was for aircraft utilization.
I don't think that NWA will move to A. Continental was quite reluctant and took quite a bit of coaxing from Massport. I think the problem is the lease is so much higher than the other terminals. Of course, all this might be moot, if Delta merges with NWA. I think that NWA's operations are not that huge. If NWA does move to A, I think the Amsterdam flights will probably stay in Terminal E. It's quite a way to tow it and most of Boston's traffic is O&D anyway, who knows, hopefully KLM can take over from NWA. I would like to see them over NWA anyday. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lexington
Posts: 2,819
|
I think some of this relates to the plan to have a China flight and some Middle East (Quatar, Emirates) airline start 787 Service within the next two years
The 787 will need to have a specialized gate area Westy |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Back Bay
Posts: 964
|
The only chance Boston has at a middle east carrier is Emirates and it's going to be a lot more than 2 years, probably more like 5-8, maybe 10, quite likely never. Quatar, as you call it, is not coming to Boston. Etihad may, but that's even less likely than Emirates. As for the 787 needing a specialized gate area, the 787 was designed as it was largely so that unlike the Airbus A380, airports would not have to be extensively updated to accomodate it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,037
|
why would the 787 need a specialized gate area? its a mid-sized jetliner. The airbus a380 is the biggest in the world you can't compare the two
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Back Bay
Posts: 964
|
They don't need a specialized gate area, as I said, it's around the same size as a 767. WH has no clue what he's talking about on this one.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Logan Flight Additions | lexicon506 | Transit and Infrastructure | 1273 | Today 11:21 AM |
| If Logan Airport were moved.... | JS38 | New Development | 26 | 11-24-2008 04:25 PM |
| New Logan 9/11 Monument | bostonman | New Development | 28 | 09-12-2008 12:55 PM |
| If We Moved Logan Airport... | Waldorf | General Architecture & Urban Planning | 4 | 04-05-2007 03:25 PM |
| Mosaiculture International - Boston 2009 | PaulC | New Development | 1 | 09-04-2006 10:24 PM |