![]() |
|
|||||||
| New Development New urban and/or architectural developments in Boston metro. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
|
"View from Yawkey Station" shows a large, wide stairway at the right edge of the drawing, but I can't figure out where this is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 5,658
|
Shh...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North End
Posts: 1,281
|
Where are they going to put all the cars when they cover the old parking lot? The Sox own those little 1 level garages by the High School. Maybe build them up? It's needed because, let's not kid ourselves, that area is for suburbanite drivers and Bently Students (Tequila Rain Bra!).
As awesome as covering the pike and getting ride of a large surface parking lot are, this project is going to create a transportation nightmare. As it stands, Kenmore Station is a disaster during Baseball Season. Coupled with this project and a reworked Lansdowne St., it's only going to get worse. I guess the bright spot is that the Sox seem willing to address transportation issues; they're contributing most of the money for the new station at Yawkey. Maybe they'd like to pay for a new highway ramp, or a leg of the Urban Ring? |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 5,951
|
Kenmore really does need an upgrade. It's had plywood panels blocking up platforms for...how long now?
At least there's a new bus terminal going in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
banished
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 935
|
Thanks for the renderings from the PDF, but I think those are obsolete, based on the article in B&T.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,025
|
Quote:
![]() Thats a massive parking garage, between two people buildings (not sure if commercial or residential) along the street. I think where the 8 is may also be a garage. And hopefully the new Yawkey sees trains all day, not just rush hour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: My house
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brookline
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Boston
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
banished
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
those towers were like wicked sick and stuff |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
banished
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 222
|
<post deleted by moderator>
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
|
Great use of free speech Bobby. No really, keep up the good work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
banished
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 222
|
Hey! i like the notice that the post was deleted. nice touch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlestown
Posts: 2,500
|
Quote:
Back on topic, wasn't the reason for the removal of the two towers was because of the fact that it blocked the Citgo Sign or possibly cause wind change into Fenway Park? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,585
|
I thought it was because either Brookline objected to the height or that the Red Sox didn't want people watching their games for free.
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 389
|
I would guess that the height was more of an issue than the Sox, since they have no trouble filling Fenway Park and people watching from windows would not cut into the demand enough to lower the ticket prices.
A brainstorm I had was that the Sox would make a deal with the developer to add bleachers to the roofs of some of these buildings... They'd probably still be closer than the upper decks at other ballparks, or at least have a better view and more cache. The Sox would get a cut of the ticket sales, the rest going to the developer, or maybe the Sox would get all the proceeds in exchange for a sizable contribution to the development cost. The neighbors would hate it, and of course it will never happen, but they had a lot of success with it in Chicago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
banished
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charlestown
Posts: 2,500
|
Developer teams with Sox on new Pike proposal
By Scott Van Voorhis Boston Herald Business Reporter Wednesday, August 22, 2007 A local developer and the Boston Red Sox [team stats] yesterday unveiled a $400 million plan to build offices, shops and apartments alongside and over the Massachusetts Turnpike near Fenway Park [map]. Newton-based builder and prominent anti-gun activist John Rosenthal and the Red Sox presented the 1.2-million-square-foot One Kenmore proposal to a community review panel appointed by City Hall. The move comes after months of talks resulted in an agreement in principle by Rosenthal and the Sox to work together as joint venture partners on the One Kenmore development. The Sox will also become minority investors in the project, with a final agreement expected to be approved soon by John Henry?s Sox ownership group. ?It?s a true joint venture,? Rosenthal said. ?We are presenting (plans) together. I will be the lead developer.? The proposal envisions a mixed-used complex taking shape both next to and on a deck to be built over the Massachusetts Turnpike and between Brookline Avenue and Beacon Street. The project would have 353 apartments, 200,000 square feet of office space and 107,000 square feet of retail and shops. The project will also include a new Yawkey rail and bus station inside the complex, as well as 1,344 parking spaces. It will also include 29,000 square feet of open space. For Rosenthal, the proposal also represents a major shift over earlier plans of just a few months ago, with four smaller buildings ranging from seven to 17 stories. Previous proposals had buildings ranging as high as 30 stories. The current plans also put a new emphasis on office and retail space, now hot sectors of the real estate market. At the same time, Rosenthal and the Sox have cut in half the amount of residential space, from 668 previously, with no plans for any condos. ?Residential condominiums are nearly impossible to finance,? Rosenthal said. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| carlos zapata studio, fenway, john rosenthal, meredith management corp., turnpike air rights |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kenmore Sq | ant8904 | Design a Better Boston | 53 | 07-14-2011 06:50 PM |
| Mass Turnpike PARCEL 16 | JohnAKeith | New Development | 3 | 02-06-2009 11:17 AM |
| Kenmore Bus Station? | Boston Needs A ShakeShack | Transit and Infrastructure | 2 | 07-18-2008 11:53 AM |
| Parcel 7 (One Kenmore) Air Rights Public Meeting | briv | Boston Architecture/Urbanism Related Events | 0 | 01-30-2008 07:13 PM |
| Back Bay turnpike ramps | PaulC | Transit and Infrastructure | 44 | 05-14-2007 03:11 PM |