archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Outside Of Boston Metro > Greater New England

Greater New England All things architectural or urban in Greater New England, beyond the boundaries of Boston Metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2011, 09:54 AM   #61
datadyne007
Senior Member
 
datadyne007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chelsea, MA
Posts: 8,119
Re: Jetport

Wow that is pathetic. Horrible planning and facilities management.
datadyne007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 11:08 AM   #62
John_French
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 71
Re: Jetport

The new airport, to management is nothing more than a "SRO people warehouse", until a plane leaves or takes off, they really do not care, or money would have been in the build budget for seating, IMO. Size does matter to them though, seating does not, unless it is for their own bottoms.
John_French is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 11:26 AM   #63
Corey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 1,375
Send a message via AIM to Corey
Re: Jetport

I see their point about the gate seating being more expensive because it has built in electrical outlets and such, but the avoidance of seating in the rest of the terminal does indeed seem to be poor planning. Here's a bench for $100 that kind of matches the new terminal, just sprinkle a few of these around for now.
Corey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:27 PM   #64
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,278
Re: Jetport

As anyone involved with design in any way knows, sometimes after-the-fact completely obvious shortcomings become visible that were not noted (although should have been) prior to seeing the thing in existence and noting how people use and interact with it.

The same exact problem we are discussing here--seating--was a huge shortcoming (and still is) in many public plaza designs across the country. People forget that they are designing places for people.

That being said, for all the complaining on here, this is a tremendous structure, with a warm feeling created by the wooden beams, which is atypical of a larger airport, and if the only major shortcoming is seating, then I see no reason why Corey's $100 benches shouldn't be able to fix the problem. I think this addition is a huge success.
__________________
I like urbanism, big and small, near and far.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 12:49 PM   #65
datadyne007
Senior Member
 
datadyne007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chelsea, MA
Posts: 8,119
Re: Jetport

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
As anyone involved with design in any way knows, sometimes after-the-fact completely obvious shortcomings become visible that were not noted (although should have been) prior to seeing the thing in existence and noting how people use and interact with it.
But that is not the case. The e-mail response from them proves that it was their intention to not have seating from the get-go, nor do they have any sense of urgency to correct this blatant error caused by incompetent planners. There is no way that you can successfully argue against seating in a check-in area. They seem to have completely forgetten that people pick up other people (aka "arrivals") at airports and have to wait until the plane the person is coming off of actually arrives. Throw in a delay and the person picking up the passenger is supposed to stand for 4 hours? That's absurd.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
That being said, for all the complaining on here, this is a tremendous structure, with a warm feeling created by the wooden beams, which is atypical of a larger airport, and if the only major shortcoming is seating, then I see no reason why Corey's $100 benches shouldn't be able to fix the problem. I think this addition is a huge success.
You're right it is an incredible structure and even with cheap furniture, the architecture can most definitely hold its own. Right now, it looks like a fancy banquet hall.
datadyne007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 03:16 PM   #66
Lrfox
Senior Member
 
Lrfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,062
Re: Jetport

I haven't been in to the new terminal, but from the outside it looks REALLY nice. I was up in the area last week after not having been to Portland since last spring. The terminal is a great improvement over what was the previous iteration. A far cry from the abortion taking place on the side of the Wyndham Hotel buildings down the road. What's up with that?
Lrfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 03:48 PM   #67
Portlander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Where else?
Posts: 384
Re: Jetport

It is an attempt to tone the buildings down a bit and rid them of their "seventies" appearance. Elvis was scheduled to stay on the 9th floor suite of the taller structure on the evening of the day he died for a concert at the Civic Center. Word has it that his advance party had all the windows totally covered in tin foil so light would not come into the suite.
Portlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 05:37 PM   #68
choo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
Re: Jetport

I was in terminal C in logan last week, I am not positive, but i dont remember much seating outside of security. Although there are a couple restaurants.
choo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 08:13 PM   #69
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,278
Re: Jetport

I neglected to read the email on the previous page, so you are right, datadyne, that is not the case here. But the director did say he envisions or at least foresees seating in the future. He wanted to put in the electrical outlets, like you see with iPods hooked into them at larger airports, not just a bench. If a bench was put in place, I can see people saying "what is with Maine, people don't use cell phones or laptops there? where are the plugs?"

All in all the place is still a huge success in my opinion.
__________________
I like urbanism, big and small, near and far.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 09:51 PM   #70
mainejeff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 175
Re: Jetport

Flying has become a hassle in so many ways.......thanks PWM for adding to it just a little bit more.
mainejeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 07:02 PM   #71
Portlander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Where else?
Posts: 384
Re: Jetport

New service between Portland and Halifax, NS via Elite Airways starts in June making the "international" in the Jetport's name a little more relevant.
Portlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2017, 12:48 PM   #72
Hubman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Anywhere, USA
Posts: 555
Re: Jetport

Why did they ever call it a jetport anyway? Were they not happy with "airport".
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysmith95 View Post
Gold doesn't signify luxury, it signifies bad taste.
Hubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2017, 01:20 PM   #73
Portlander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Where else?
Posts: 384
Re: Jetport

It was a marketing ploy decades ago when PWM started to grow and eventually shift away from prop aircraft to actual jet service.
Portlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2017, 01:33 PM   #74
Seanflynn78
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 77
Re: Jetport

I heard the reason why it is called "Jetport" instead of Airport was not to confuse customers with Portland Oregon. Regardless it makes for a unique name for a terrific small Airport.
Seanflynn78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.