archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Transit and Infrastructure

Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2018, 12:47 PM   #41
tangent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,503
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDowntown View Post
Bidding process has started to replace the two North Station drawspans with two three-track drawbridges.

Per the Globe:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...wBM/story.html
Should just build a new North station at Boston Sand and Gravel. All this to get trains just across the river and then stop.

Seriously, for $100 million (the cost to just design it)... they could buy out Boston Sand and gravel and build a bunch of platforms on the North side of the river. And then most people can just walk over a pedestrian bridge, transfer to the Orange line or Green Line or whatever.

That configuration would eventually work better with NSRL and a new underground "North Station" also.

Last edited by tangent; 10-15-2018 at 12:59 PM.
tangent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 01:06 PM   #42
CSTH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,595
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

I say why not replace the draw with fixed spans, and expand the charles river locks with 25-ft deep basins extending all the way under the tracks so boats can go down and under the tracks, then back up again on the other side. #crazytransitpitches
CSTH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 01:21 PM   #43
JeffDowntown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Cove
Posts: 2,593
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSTH View Post
I say why not replace the draw with fixed spans, and expand the charles river locks with 25-ft deep basins extending all the way under the tracks so boats can go down and under the tracks, then back up again on the other side. #crazytransitpitches
I would suspect that the long deep locks and the systems to cycle them would be more expensive than the drawbridges.

Are there examples where people have done that (dropped boats down under fixed bridges via deep locks)? (Legitimately asking.)
__________________
Jeff H.
Downtown, South Cove
JeffDowntown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 01:32 PM   #44
tangent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,503
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSTH View Post
I say why not replace the draw with fixed spans, and expand the charles river locks with 25-ft deep basins extending all the way under the tracks so boats can go down and under the tracks, then back up again on the other side. #crazytransitpitches
Or just say boats are not allowed to travel between the harbor and the river... I mean how many extra millions are we spending on draw bridges and locks for how many boats? I know I know... it's the law. But we are supposed to be able to change laws when they become excessively wasteful and onerous... Like spending tens of millions in taxpayer money to provide a right of way for 75 to 100 boats that mostly spend their time docked at the marina or just stay in the river anyway and duck boats.
tangent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 01:33 PM   #45
ceo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 112
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by tangent View Post
Seriously, for $100 million (the cost to just design it)... they could buy out Boston Sand and gravel and build a bunch of platforms on the North side of the river. And then most people can just walk over a pedestrian bridge, transfer to the Orange line or Green Line or whatever.
$100 million is the design and construction cost. And relocating a major station more than a quarter mile further away from its transit links just to get out of rebuilding a bridge strikes me as... not a great plan.
ceo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 01:49 PM   #46
tangent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,503
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceo View Post
$100 million is the design and construction cost. And relocating a major station more than a quarter mile further away from its transit links just to get out of rebuilding a bridge strikes me as... not a great plan.
Sorry thought the article said it was $100 million for just the design. $100 million isn't that bad then for a bridge replacement project.

Just frustrating that NSRL is dead in the water and the MBTA is clearly paying lip service to it.
tangent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 02:12 PM   #47
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,474
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

It's not just a rehab. They're expanding track capacity from 2 to 3 on the approach spans for a lot more fluidity coming on/off the platforms and in/out of the fan-out of tracks at Tower A interlocking. It's a substantial capacity enhancement that'll ease the traffic crunch there a lot.



You still may need a third draw if the entire North gets Indigo-fied on every mainline out to 128 and the 495-land schedules start buffing out and crossing the NH state line. And need it with or without NSRL because that's growth by orders of magnitude. But the draw rehabs are using every ounce of engineering flex to squeeze out more immediately usable capacity, and that is a Very Good Thing for the price.
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 02:26 PM   #48
GP40MC
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 32
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Another part of this project is the complete rebuild/redesign of the front and back ladders of Tower A Interlocking. They are badly in need of work. Reconnecting Mainline 1 at the Back Ladder would be a no brainer too.

D
GP40MC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:59 AM   #49
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,358
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDowntown View Post
Are there examples where people have..dropped boats down under fixed bridges via deep locks)?
Yes (but unbuilt) it would lower the water 26' Invented/Proposed by the Dutch:

Article from Gizmodo
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn

Last edited by Arlington; 10-16-2018 at 02:36 PM.
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 02:37 PM   #50
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,358
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP40MC View Post
Reconnecting Mainline 1 at the Back Ladder would be a no brainer too.
Is that the unused (and sometimes unballasted) track alongside Boston Sand and Gravel?
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 02:39 PM   #51
odurandina
Senior Member
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,940
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Breathing in all that coal dust and smog in that 2nd shot above....

Have plans been discussed for the laying of piles for 1 or 2 future skyscrapers spaced for for future track expansion and train shed?
odurandina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 07:37 PM   #52
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,474
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by odurandina View Post
Breathing in all that coal dust and smog in that 2nd shot above....

Have plans been discussed for the laying of piles for 1 or 2 future skyscrapers spaced for for future track expansion and train shed?
How in the hell are you going to get into a skyscraper surrounded on all 4 sides by the Leverett ramps and the busiest cement plant in New England (which is too permanently busy churning out concrete for all other Boston talls to ever evict from its property). Is Dear Leader now just building empty inaccessible towers for the sheer fun of it like they do in Pyongyang?


Jesus Christ, can we please confine nth-stage hitting of the supertall crackpipe to the smoking ruins of the Dev forum sarcophagus, please???
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:47 PM   #53
FitchburgLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 339
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by F-Line to Dudley View Post
How in the hell are you going to get into a skyscraper surrounded on all 4 sides by the Leverett ramps and the busiest cement plant in New England (which is too permanently busy churning out concrete for all other Boston talls to ever evict from its property). Is Dear Leader now just building empty inaccessible towers for the sheer fun of it like they do in Pyongyang?


Jesus Christ, can we please confine nth-stage hitting of the supertall crackpipe to the smoking ruins of the Dev forum sarcophagus, please???
Unless I'm misreading Obda, he's proposing adding supports for air rights over the North Station tracks (including the new 11/12). Seems reasonable to me, although the Spaulding parking lots will get redeveloped first.
FitchburgLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 01:08 AM   #54
GP40MC
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 32
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

The track hard along Boston Sand & Gravel is called the Tuttle Track and is active. Stub ended unfortunately. We were using to store an Amtrak set last month during the day.
Mainline 1 ends at the Back ladder (Gilmore Bridge) and hopefully gets restored to FX one of these days.
GP40MC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 10:43 AM   #55
RandomWalk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 561
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Are there concrete plans to remove the old Spaulding building? I thought its newer portion fouled the approach for 11/12.
RandomWalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 10:59 AM   #56
FitchburgLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 339
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomWalk View Post
Are there concrete plans to remove the old Spaulding building? I thought its newer portion fouled the approach for 11/12.
Update from someone who knows: it does *not* foul the current plans for track 11-12. Its removal may be required for future platform lengthening.
FitchburgLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 10:59 AM   #57
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,358
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomWalk View Post
Are there concrete plans to remove the old Spaulding building? I thought its newer portion fouled the approach for 11/12.
The most obstructive thing about Spaulding was the operationally-sensitive liquified gas (N2?) tank that used to sit on this pad, directly in the path of any new track.

From upthread, expanded tracks & platforms to go with the 3-track draws assume that Spaulding stays where it is, but that the tank's pad gets tracked over (you can see the pad between the lower red wedge and the arrow pointing to the restored track):
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scalziand View Post
Here's the spitball plan for threading in the new tracks from the document F-line linked earlier. It requires shortening platform E a bit to give the room required to snake in the lead track for the new platform past Spaulding.

Also from upthread, we concluded that removing Spaulding would:
1) Allow a straighter shot from Draw 2 to Tracks 11 & 12, which would allow longer (800ft) platform E instead of shorter 5-car size that's required given the curves required to pinch past Spaulding

2) Allow the re-installation of (the long-gone) Draw 3 (on the footings that are still there) that would allow NS to be expanded to its original size on what is now parking lots, but would not need Draw 4 (since the advent of push-pull trains eliminates steam-engine deadheading)

Quote:
Originally Posted by F-Line to Dudley View Post

[]Draws 3 & 4 became expendable once steam locomotives were retired...Fully one-half of the moves across the 4 draws were non-revenue backup moves that cycled inbound-facing trainsets for outbound-facing trainsets....you would never need more than Draw 3.
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn

Last edited by Arlington; 10-17-2018 at 11:37 AM.
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 01:59 PM   #58
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,474
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Quote:
Originally Posted by FitchburgLine View Post
Update from someone who knows: it does *not* foul the current plans for track 11-12. Its removal may be required for future platform lengthening.
Yes, this. NS has too many short platforms that can't open all doors on >5 car consists. The T still needs to pick itself up off the procurement floor and order another 125+ bi-levels to replace the rapidly aging 29-32 year old Bombardier fleet of flats so there's one more pivot to make before platform lengthening has to go on the table. But northside rush hour will demand six-packs of bi-levels within a decade and the Downeaster's probably going to get lengthened now that Amtrak is finally RFP'ing for its Amfleet replacements.


Spaulding building is currently being rented by MGH for overflow admin office space, but everybody inside is on a short-term lease so nobody's anticipating that building to be more than a year-to-year concern.
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2018, 09:21 AM   #59
GP40MC
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 32
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Tracks 1 & 2 are the shortest tracks, with Track 8-9-10 the longest. A good example of some operational problems was yesterday with the Downeaster. 686 was 12 car lengths long due to extra equipment for Southampton Street Yard on the rear. Wouldn't fit anywhere and had to wait for No.331 to leave off Track 7. Due to the late return of the Southampton St extra, it was tacked on to 688/689's equipment on Track 10.
GP40MC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2018, 09:49 AM   #60
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,358
Re: North Station, Charles River Draw, & Tower A

Refresh my memory: was Spaulding built on a ground lease? (hard to believe anybody'd have sold it fee simple)

If NO, what are MassDOT's plans for eminent domain?

If YES, how many years before the land reverts to the B&M (and who is the B&M's successor as owner of the underlying land?)
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charles River Park DowntownDave Development Projects 219 08-17-2016 12:01 PM
North Station-South Station Rail Link stick n move Design a Better Boston 103 11-03-2014 10:04 PM
Never Built Charles River Bridges? davem Boston Architecture & Urbanism 6 02-09-2014 08:44 PM
Charles River water taxi GW2500 Design a Better Boston 30 07-23-2010 10:38 AM
Future of Charles River Park DowntownDave General 1 07-18-2006 11:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.