archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Development Projects

Development Projects New urban and/or architectural developments in Boston metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2018, 12:33 PM   #281
estyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 229
Re: Roxbury Developments

Roxbury in general seems to suffer from the super block more than other areas of Boston. Probably because they are government projects and people used the latest idea. It is sad that one of the most beautiful areas of Boston, with such great natural topography, has been so badly abused. I hope as those developments age out they are replaced in a way that is more connected, per Whittier and Orient Heights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanshnookenraggen View Post


Looks like that land was cleared for the interchange (1962). Obviously plans changed as Madison Park/Campus High UR was developed after the interchange was moved.



A small point of interest, I never understood why the small residential section along Melnea Cass had the extra side streets right up against the boulevard. Clearly they were designed when I-695 was still planned and they wanted to keep them separate from the frontage roads. It's a total waste of space today.
estyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 03:10 PM   #282
vanshnookenraggen
Moderator
 
vanshnookenraggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 6,226
Re: Roxbury Developments

Part of what I'm railing against is that the city isn't doing anything to fix these problems. They are keeping most of the mid-20th Century planning mistakes and just in filling the parts that never got filled or leaving small new sections to developers. I'm not suggesting we go back to the top down planning of old but rather look at the street grid and think of ways for new development to knit the city back together, rather than this suburban sprawl going on.
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com | http://hyperrealcartography.tumblr.com
brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play
vanshnookenraggen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 08:49 PM   #283
FK4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,076
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanshnookenraggen View Post
Part of what I'm railing against is that the city isn't doing anything to fix these problems. They are keeping most of the mid-20th Century planning mistakes and just in filling the parts that never got filled or leaving small new sections to developers. I'm not suggesting we go back to the top down planning of old but rather look at the street grid and think of ways for new development to knit the city back together, rather than this suburban sprawl going on.
The barriers separating Roxbury from the rest of the city are significant, and the numerous no outlet street systems that comprise the endless housing projects only reinforce the ghettoization - in the true meaning of that word. The Longwood Medical Area is literally right down the street from Dudley but it's worlds apart.. you've got Columbus Ave + the Orange Line, but the entire east wall of Columbus is superblocks of Roxbury CC, then Madison Park, then the Whittier St development. They'll never repair the street grid through RCC, but I fear there will be little change as re Madison. The Tremont Crossing development looks like maybe there will be some tiny connection, Dudley-ward, but I'm sure it will be some one way BS road or something. And I am sure there will be endless resistance from the neighborhood as well as school to doing what really needs to be done, which is a two way roadway connection from Columbus to Dudley that's between Melnea and Malcolm X.
FK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 09:26 PM   #284
tysmith95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,246
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Originally Posted by FK4 View Post
numerous no outlet street systems
I'm totally getting off topic here, but I think this really fucks up traffic in many places. Alewife is so bad because they thought it would be a good idea to drop off a highway into a single city street (Alewife Parkway) and connect it to a bunch of streets that don't have any outlets. It's a recipe for disaster and the worst designed part of the Boston area. Even the transit station is not at all pedestrian friendly.

Roxbury doesn't have the traffic issues of Alewife. But they should definitively try to transform some of the low income housing into mixed income denser developments.

Although to be honest I think the percentage of low income residents needs to be a third or less for it to work the best. Any higher, and the property values of the market rate would be dragged down and the place would still turn into the ghetto that housing projects created when they were built.

I think the city should have pushed harder to include more affordable units in the Seaport rather then pushing it out to poorer areas. A spread of subsidized units is much better then having the units concentrated in certain neighborhoods.
tysmith95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2018, 01:08 AM   #285
vanshnookenraggen
Moderator
 
vanshnookenraggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 6,226
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Originally Posted by tysmith95 View Post
Although to be honest I think the percentage of low income residents needs to be a third or less for it to work the best. Any higher, and the property values of the market rate would be dragged down and the place would still turn into the ghetto that housing projects created when they were built.
This is a fine line to walk because mixing incomes often leaves out services that cater to the poorer residents simply because they themselves cannot afford to be there anymore. Breaking up poor neighborhoods is even more disastrous because the social support system is itself so important and fragile. Middle class residents have more options but poorer residents don't. This means that an area like Dudley Sq needs to be redeveloped more consciously than other, more affluent areas. All I'm saying is we can do that AND create a better urban environment at the same time.
__________________
http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com | http://futurembta.com | http://hyperrealcartography.tumblr.com
brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play
vanshnookenraggen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2018, 09:49 PM   #286
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

1065 Tremont Phase II



1004-08 Tremont




Last edited by BeeLine; 06-13-2018 at 10:04 PM.
BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2018, 10:05 PM   #287
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

150 Camden



This is the Madison Melnea Cass Apartment Project.

BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 11:52 PM   #288
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

2489-93 Washington





BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 06:37 AM   #289
Suffolk 83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South End
Posts: 2,053
Re: Roxbury Developments

I drove on Washington from Cummings hwy to Melnea Cass for the first time since last summer and wow there's a lot of development on that stretch since then.

Beeline maybe you know whats the large development that has its foundation dug near Boston Latin?
Suffolk 83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 07:17 AM   #290
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suffolk 83 View Post
I drove on Washington from Cummings hwy to Melnea Cass for the first time since last summer and wow there's a lot of development on that stretch since then.

Beeline maybe you know whats the large development that has its foundation dug near Boston Latin?
Responce to your question on the JP Infill thread.
BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 08:15 AM   #291
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

Foundation work has started at 2731 Washington
BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2018, 05:23 PM   #292
12345
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Developer Michael McGough of Dorchester has filed plans with the BPDA to replace a vacant lot on Warren Street at Winthrop Street in Dudley Square with a five-story, 21-studio apartment building - with ground-floor space for a restaurant or shop.

https://www.universalhub.com/2018/st...ant-lot-dudley
12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 10:51 PM   #293
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments











BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 10:59 PM   #294
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments





BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 11:04 PM   #295
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments









BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 11:10 PM   #296
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments



40 Raynor Circle



BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 11:17 PM   #297
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

600 Melena Cass Blvd









BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2018, 10:11 PM   #298
BeeLine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,682
Re: Roxbury Developments

2489-93 Washington



BeeLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2018, 06:02 AM   #299
JeffDowntown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Cove
Posts: 2,693
Re: Roxbury Developments

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeLine View Post
For relatively low cost construction and materials, this building came out pretty nice! There seems to be just enough going on here to make it interesting to look at.
__________________
Jeff H.
Downtown, South Cove
JeffDowntown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2018, 12:48 PM   #300
FK4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,076
Re: Roxbury Developments

A Dunkin is big for this area. Great.
FK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
South End / Lower Roxbury art by Allan Rohan Crite JohnAKeith Boston Architecture & Urbanism 17 12-09-2011 12:26 AM
West Roxbury statler Boston Architecture & Urbanism 7 09-10-2009 10:17 AM
USM Portland developments TheBostonian Greater New England 26 04-06-2009 06:01 AM
Mallory Building (780 Albany St. Roxbury) statler Boston Architecture & Urbanism 0 08-28-2007 08:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.