archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Transit and Infrastructure

Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2016, 06:51 PM   #1
FK4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,781
Everett and north metro Boston transit

This was shared in another thread...
I think the region in general has pretty bad traffic so if other proposals happen they can go here as well...
https://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Port...eting41316.pdf
FK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 07:26 PM   #2
bigeman312
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jamaica Plain
Posts: 1,424
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

This is filled with amazing proposals. A lot of low-cost, high-benefit, smart investments that realign/extend/contract/split bus routes where appropriate. In general, I like everything I see here. The short-term highlight is a "Transit Emphasis Corridor" along Broadway:

Quote:
Broadway Bus Only Lanes

Proposed Improvement:
  • Rush hour/peak direction bus lanes on Broadway (Sweetser Circle to Glendale Square)
  • All day bus lanes on Lower Broadway to Sullivan Square

Benefits:
  • Faster and more reliable service on Broadway
  • Time savings could potentially be re-invested in more frequent service
There are also a lot of interesting proposals for the Silver Line extension to Everett and beyond on the mid/long term.
bigeman312 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2016, 10:33 PM   #3
Scalziand
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 450
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

There's also the crackpot proposals, like the Glendale OL spur and Saugus DMU.

I do like the River's Edge OL infill though.
__________________
Shadows no longer exist. They will henceforth be known as shade.
Scalziand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 08:52 AM   #4
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,365
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeman312 View Post
This is filled with amazing proposals. A lot of low-cost, high-benefit, smart investments that realign/extend/contract/split bus routes where appropriate. In general, I like everything I see here. The short-term highlight is a "Transit Emphasis Corridor" along Broadway:



There are also a lot of interesting proposals for the Silver Line extension to Everett and beyond on the mid/long term.
It would require some MassHighway improvements to Route 16 first for the nasty queues around the Gateway rotary at peak load...but continuing SL Gateway on-street to Wellington seems like a very high-return project for the money. There's not going to be any continuation of the busway west of the Mall until it's Urban Ring time because of the need to switch sides of the ROW at 2nd with very expensive flyovers, so shooting over to 16 + Wellington may be the best Phase II they can shoot for in the near-term.

While hooking up Everett St. after a loop at the Mall may catch more riders, for keeping travel times tolerable they may want to consider spitting the busway out behind Market Basket onto 3rd, then banging a right onto much lower-volume 2nd to 16 which is 5 fewer traffic lights than Everett Ave. + 16.


Other than that...yes, the town is badly in need of a route overhaul. Sifting through those proposals should net a couple winners, although I fully expect T indifference to leave them at status quo.

Good idea to be pushing hard for the trail extension to Gateway too for completing the connection to the Mystic path system. That opens up everything to the west out to Alewife when the Route 16 bridges are replaced for wider sidewalks. They've got a little bit of a tough solve at Spalding St. under the rotary overpass because the T's ballast pile is mission-critical for commuter rail maintenance and still uses that first 1200 ft. of Saugus Branch track under the bridge. Tight squeeze and a trespassing liability concern.

The crackpot schemes are crackpot...no surprise there.
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2016, 03:48 PM   #5
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,258
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by F-Line to Dudley View Post
Other than that...yes, the town is badly in need of a route overhaul. Sifting through those proposals should net a couple winners, although I fully expect T indifference to leave them at status quo.
I really like the idea of streamlining service on Main St and directing it to Sullivan Sq's Camb/Som bus hub instead of Wellington's "park and ride".

Mostly it reflects the changes that have occurred over the last 10 years in Somerville and Cambridge:
  • as employment centers, they still have same/more service jobs
  • as places to live they are affordable for people in service jobs

So now there are low-moderate wage people who need to commute into Somerville and Cambridge in a way that there weren't (when Everett's current Orange-Line-focused system was designed)
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 06:12 PM   #6
mtnorshore
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Broadway needs a serious rethink.
mtnorshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 09:40 PM   #7
Scipio
Senior Member
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 482
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

The Globe has a story on the Everett transit plan that the state has been working on. Some heavy duty recommendations:

Quote:
■ A new Orange Line Station between the Wellington and Malden Center stops.

■ Bus-only lanes during peak hours on Broadway Street in Everett from Sweetser Circle to Glendale Square, a $1 million project that would convert parking spots into an extra traffic lane a few hours every day. Signals could also give buses priority over regular traffic on congested streets.

■ A $30 million extension of Silver Line bus service through Everett to Malden Center. It could follow Second Street, Broadway, Ferry, and Centre streets.

■ A $7 million to $9 million pedestrian foot bridge over the Malden River between Malden and Medford to give Everett residents better access to a new Orange Line station.

■ A $4 million to $5 million extension of the Northern Strand Community Trail from its current terminus in Everett to a park near Gateway Center in Everett, closer to the casino.
Link: http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/201...tjI/story.html
Scipio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 09:50 AM   #8
tangent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,390
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

All that looks good, except for the high price range on the station ($85 million to $95 million) and the continued lack of a good pedestrian/bike connection across the Mystic between Assembly and the Gateway Center to tie it all together.
tangent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 10:31 AM   #9
The EGE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 596
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

River's Edge might be a worthwhile infill station. Might. But not at that price. Assembly cost $50 million - more than an aboveground station should - and they're claiming this will cost almost twice that. For $90 million, you could extend the Orange Line to Roslindale, or Wyoming Hill, or probably both if you reigned in contractor corruption.
The EGE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 10:42 AM   #10
JeffDowntown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Cove
Posts: 2,493
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by The EGE View Post
River's Edge might be a worthwhile infill station. Might. But not at that price. Assembly cost $50 million - more than an aboveground station should - and they're claiming this will cost almost twice that. For $90 million, you could extend the Orange Line to Roslindale, or Wyoming Hill, or probably both if you reigned in contractor corruption.
Agreed, the current density in that light industrial/commercial area is way too low. Unless there are plans to bulldoze the entire area and start over, I don't see how you get to station-worthy density.
__________________
Jeff H.
Downtown, South Cove
JeffDowntown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 10:55 AM   #11
datadyne007
Senior Member
 
datadyne007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Everett, MA
Posts: 8,337
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Infill between Wellington & Malden Center has been planned since 1945:

http://www.wardmaps.com/viewasset.php?aid=9801

(The present day Orange Line is plan-east on this map. For whatever reason, the Transit Recess Commission loved to turn these maps geographically upside-down.)
__________________
Commuter Rail. Reimagined. Read the report: regionalrail.net
Electrification + High Platforms + Infrastructure + Frequent Service + Free Transfers = #REGIONALRAIL
datadyne007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 11:27 AM   #12
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,365
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

If I had to guess the OL station's blowout price tag is partly a function of the amount of retaining wall work they'd have to do to next to the inbound track to buff out the Pearl St.-side embankment for additional room. The disused siding track on the CR has a proposal for refurb into a full-service Haverhill/Reading passing track between 16 and Medford St. That's mandatory for future schedule increases or any hopes of an Indigo-frequency 128 train to Reading. So there'll be no room on the Commercial St. side to shift things over, and all of the space for a regular 2-track island OL station will have to come by eating the 40 ft. buffer on the west side.

Price probably eliminates it from consideration, because I can't possibly see how River's Edge would outrank a Red-Braintree stop on the Dorchester side of the Neponset as easiest-grab infill opportunity now.


Footbridge obviously not going there if the River's Edge price tag throws cold water on that plan. Does it really matter anyway when the new widened 16 bridge 1/2 mile downstream is going to have much better sidewalks, and Medford St. 500 paces from this would-be station exit has a crossing?

Far better deal would be to sit and wait for Pan Am to inevitably abandon the Medford Branch freight spur, which hasn't seen a train since 2010, and target that for a commuter path to River's Edge/Wellington from the adjacent Middlesex Ave. and Fellsway neighborhoods. Those poor saps have extremely poor walking-distance access because of the Wellington Circle carpocalypse. New footbridge over the surface tracks to River's Edge Dr., then Middlesex Ave. crosswalk and existing Fellsway underpass on the ROW to open up all that residential density to a straight, safe shot. Could probably do that for one-quarter the cost of this too-duplicate River's Edge footbridge and draw more total Orange riders from all that Medford density cut off by the W. Circle terrorscape.



Honestly don't know why they're bothering to extend the Silver busway to 2nd, as the short money for the 2-block extension adds next to nothing in schedule efficiency. That $30M would be much better spent doing up Everett Ave. and Chelsea St. for full bus signal priority, ADA bump-outs, and the full slew of Key Bus Route improvements that boost the 110 and 112 in a package with the new silver-paint express bus. If Broadway's getting those fixins' as a separate line item it seems silly to not include the other big leg of the 110/112 and bootstrap Silver onto that instead for max bang-for-buck. What's the difference between a slightly-improved Everett Ave./Chelsea St. and a 2nd St. cutover...4 minutes for 1-2 more stops' ridership? Take the strength-in-numbers package that lifts all boats.

Last edited by F-Line to Dudley; 10-04-2016 at 11:45 AM.
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 11:50 AM   #13
sm89
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Somerville
Posts: 684
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

I didn't realize this stuff was really being considered. While I've always felt that the ride between Wellington and Malden was pretty long, I didn't think an infill station was something that was being considered. I'd rather they figure out how to make a ped/bike crossing of the underpass near River's Edge in the meantime (I know the proposals have always been to remove the underpass). It would be a great benefit to connect Highland Ave to Wellington with a mixed use path on the former rail ROW. River's Edge ended up being a suburban office park/residential development, but there is still more to be built. There is also potential for the strip mall across from BJs on Highland Ave. These abutters should be the main backers of an infill station.

I think the bus changes are amazing and I really want them to happen. I feel like it could easily be killed through the typical "study" excuse, meaning "this looks great, but we're already doing a whole network bus route review and will hold off until that is complete" and then years later it dies without anything happening. Everett has made their wishes pretty clear. Let's accommodate them.

Regarding Broadway, while there are bike lanes on both sides, it is SOOO scary to ride there. The traffic is so fast. I'm interested to see how dedicated bus lanes would affect biking. Will the bike lanes be eliminated? Made into a cycle track on one side?
sm89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 04:34 PM   #14
cden4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,023
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

The bus lanes would not be in that section. They'd be north of that...
cden4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 10:57 PM   #15
curcuas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 227
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Do we think that if they selected a master developer and rezoned the area around "River's Edge," the station could be built and paid for by the developer? It'd be an interesting test to see if a private sector agent could build transit cheaper than the MBTA...
curcuas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 11:01 PM   #16
tysmith95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,058
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by curcuas View Post
Do we think that if they selected a master developer and rezoned the area around "River's Edge," the station could be built and paid for by the developer? It'd be an interesting test to see if a private sector agent could build transit cheaper than the MBTA...
I believe that a chunk of Assembly Station was paid for by the developer of assembly row.
tysmith95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2016, 01:14 PM   #17
F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,365
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by curcuas View Post
Do we think that if they selected a master developer and rezoned the area around "River's Edge," the station could be built and paid for by the developer? It'd be an interesting test to see if a private sector agent could build transit cheaper than the MBTA...
You could...but if the driver for that price is the retaining wall work required to create the width for it that's probably not going to be one of the cost items the private sector would pay for because of all the engagement with other private abutters. The developer fun bux would pay for the station facility, not the land prep. And since this is a pretty small station, there may not be a whole lot of cost offsets to be had just building a smarter headhouse + platform + egress.

$90M just isn't going to get this on anyone's recommended list. They have to present a proposal that's at least a $25-30M lower estimate to even have a starting point for negotiation, because it doesn't take much of a cost overrun to push $90M into 9 figures and blow out the public share of public-private to something approaching the original price tag. If that embankment work sets the outer limits for how much savings a better station facility can serve up, then it's just not going to rate well with other transit improvements.



I get that they're going with the Assembly template here, but Rivers Edge redev ≠ Assembly as a slam-dunk growth prospect. Assembly Row could've been a moderate-or-worse disappointment and still handily packed riders onto that stop. It's just that big. Rivers Edge may need to show more in the on-the-ground results department before anyone's willing to take on a highish cost target for the stop. >$60M is just too big a leap of faith, especially when there's a whole lot of other small-money tweaks in the bag of access tricks (e.g. better ped connections to the river from the Fellsway residential density) that'll keep accelerating the forward momentum around that TOD.

The OL site will always be available; it was available when the extension was studied in the 1940's and 70's; it'll be available for infill studies through the 2040's. So in no way is it a "use it or lose it" thing with any time limit. But the live development is going to have to compel more live transit demand instead of post-redev projections leading it by the nose, because the margins just don't look nearly good enough on this initial stab at the numbers to swallow that price tag in 2016. Do full due diligence on the infill study because cost-benefit can definitely move to much more favorable ground as future redev becomes well-established neighborhood anchor, but Greater Malden should avoid distracting themselves with too much target fixation on this OL infill being The One Big Thing™ to distraction of other meaningfully mundane improvements, or getting too caught up in apples-oranges Assembly comparisons.
F-Line to Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 11:37 AM   #18
BostonUrbEx
Senior Member
 
BostonUrbEx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Shore
Posts: 4,250
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

The article in the Globe relevant to all of the above discussion came from the third and final Everett Transit Action Plan meeting. The consultant who seemed to have been behind the River's Edge plan seemed to have no idea of how to actually cobble the thing together. In a span of about three minutes he proposed 1. forcing the abandonment of the Medford Branch (can't do that), 2. getting a developer of Town Line Plaza to fully fund the new station (probably never going to pay it fully, and probably wouldn't be able to pay much at all for the land's size and zoning), and 3. all the focus was on the Malden River pedestrian bridge versus Medford St.

I can definitely see merits for a station here. The distance between Wellington and Malden is longer than between Wellington and Sullivan. There used to be a station here during the B&M railroad days called Edgeworth. This would be the focal point of east Medford, west Everett, and even south Malden. Increased zoning is a must, and the street grid should be looked into. For example, could Avon St or Devir St be punched through the embankment to Commercial St at least as pedestrian-only?

The consultant just seemed a bit of a snake oil salesman. He had some decent ideas, but he was just overselling and oversimplifying.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by choo View Post
forget it ever happening, its too great an idea.
BostonUrbEx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 10:42 PM   #19
curcuas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 227
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Quote:
Originally Posted by F-Line to Dudley View Post
You could...but if the driver for that price is the retaining wall work required to create the width for it that's probably not going to be one of the cost items the private sector would pay for because of all the engagement with other private abutters. The developer fun bux would pay for the station facility, not the land prep. And since this is a pretty small station, there may not be a whole lot of cost offsets to be had just building a smarter headhouse + platform + egress.
Fair enough - I mostly ask because one of the biggest drivers of transit construction costs in the US is shoddy contracting. This seems like the sort of thing a developer with $$ at stake might be able to get better than the MBTA.
curcuas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 11:41 PM   #20
tangent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,390
Re: Everett and north metro Boston transit

Seems like abandoning that branch and leveling/filling in and widening the whole section would be in order versus the higher cost of widening an underutilized overpass.
tangent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Encore Boston Harbor Casino | Everett stick n move Development Projects 1527 06-17-2018 12:12 PM
Metro North Land Use Priority Plan statler Boston Architecture/Urbanism Related Events 0 04-28-2014 01:50 PM
Your Changes to Metro Boston Infrastructure mass88 Transit and Infrastructure 11 01-04-2013 11:38 AM
Urban Mass Transit Systems Of North America scootie Transit and Infrastructure 107 12-19-2012 06:35 PM
North Shore Transit Improvement Initiative: US-1 moved, new BL branch, Everett subway BostonUrbEx Design a Better Boston 24 01-09-2012 10:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.