archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Transit and Infrastructure

Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2019, 04:39 PM   #361
Riverside
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 259
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
Well, in this case, the question is can Boston unilaterally adopt and find a place in its own budget to run a circulator bus service (as DC has) such as:

Kenmore - Boylston - SS -Seaport
NS-Congress-Seaport
Longwood - Kenmore -Central
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
Fairmont Electrification
Red-Blue Connector
Bus Signal Priority
Silver-under-D
Bus Shelters (&heated ones)
Outlining this list of improvements to coincide with CZC (or its equivalent) is key to any argument in favor of it.
Riverside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2019, 11:33 AM   #362
jl326
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 530
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

After the hell that was navigating through the city yesterday evening (even though acknowledging that it was Valentine's day and evening traffic was even worse than "normal"), I would gladly fork over the $5 if it means reducing the congestion.
__________________
Haters just be hatin'
jl326 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2019, 12:20 PM   #363
stick n move
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dorchester
Posts: 5,159
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Would congestion toll proceeds go towards transit to therefore help reduce congestion?
stick n move is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2019, 01:35 PM   #364
JeffDowntown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Cove
Posts: 2,697
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stick n move View Post
Would congestion toll proceeds go towards transit to therefore help reduce congestion?
That is the general pattern seen elsewhere. Usually, though, you issue bonds to improve transit first, then apply the congestion tolls to pay back the bonds. Carrot and stick. Better transit AND costlier driving.
__________________
Jeff H.
Downtown, South Cove
JeffDowntown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2019, 09:30 PM   #365
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,517
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

https://www.wired.com/story/age-of-c...n-pricing-nyc/
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2019, 06:20 AM   #366
tysmith95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,263
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

For congestion tolling, how about you add a tax on Ubers and Taxis going to/from Back Bay/Downtown (maybe an exception from 12 until 5 am when the T isn't running).

Then you could tax parking in downtown and back bay. This includes street parking, which should cost much more than it already does. But garage parking too, which the majority of car commuters use. I'd say that tax should only be instituted on weekdays, not on weekends.

The MBTA basically has peak pricing at all of their lots and even on the commuter rail (it's $ anywhere on weekends round trip). Why not some similar tax on drivers, to pay for that 20 billion dollar tunnel.

That would institute a tax on 99%+ of people going by car to/from the central business districts. Honestly, commuting to downtown Boston by car is sort of unnecessary from almost everywhere. The commuter rail is really extensive, capacity and frequency of trains could increase though. Then you could increase the number of park and ride stations, add garage at more of them.

Of course that'll hurt Charlie driving his private SUV from Swampscott to downtown, so it probably won't happen. Though if he took the commuter rail i'm sure he'd see that it's actually faster than driving from Swampscott (though I understand the security aspect would be difficult).
tysmith95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2019, 08:13 AM   #367
GeneseeJunction
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 24
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tysmith95 View Post
The MBTA basically has peak pricing at all of their lots and even on the commuter rail (it's $ anywhere on weekends round trip). Why not some similar tax on drivers, to pay for that 20 billion dollar tunnel.
I remember reading in the 2006 Globe that they couldn't toll Big Dig use because it would slow down and negate the congestion savings. However, now that we've got continuous tolling on the Mass Pike state wide, why can't we add tolls to the Big Dig?
GeneseeJunction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2019, 03:14 PM   #368
Smartiro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Winchester
Posts: 392
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

I drive on I-93 almost every day and I agree that we need to add tolls to it if anything for fairness to I-90 drivers. However, adding tolls to federal interstate highway is not easy as it requires a permission from FHA, which will likely only allow it for a highway work project this tolls will help finance.
Smartiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2019, 09:52 PM   #369
millerm277
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 161
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

While this doesn't apply if you're just tolling the Ted and not anything else, if you're tolling under downtown you wind up reducing some of the value of the congestion charge the closer you get to the price of it.

A hypothetical trip:

Dorchester to Somerville. If we have a congestion charge but the highway is still free, and traffic's not great in the tunnel downtown, it makes leaving the highway to cut through on local roads a "stickier" decision for thru-traffic. I might choose to wait in the tunnel for 15 extra minutes over the alternate route of a dozen turns downtown that Waze gives me to avoid the traffic jam.

On the other hand, if I'm getting dinged for a toll on the highway anyway, I'm more inclined to go the fastest route rather than just staying on the highway.

Now, if your toll is $0.50 and the congestion charge is $10, it's probably not going to affect many decisions. But if your toll is a significant portion of or the full congestion charge, you will see much less deterrence of cut-through trips like that.
millerm277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 05:44 AM   #370
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,517
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

As in London and Stockholm, congestion tolls typically apply only to the city streets in the Central Business District CBD (that the city controls), and not to the roads that allow you to go across or around (90, 93), and indeed that's what's been proposed for Boston.
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 06:39 AM   #371
fattony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Davis/Ball Sq.
Posts: 1,759
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
As in London and Stockholm, congestion tolls typically apply only to the city streets in the Central Business District CBD (that the city controls), and not to the roads that allow you to go across or around (90, 93), and indeed that's what's been proposed for Boston.
Sorry, maybe I missed something. What proposal is there for congestion tolls in Boston? Other than AB fantasyland?
fattony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 05:40 PM   #372
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 3,517
Re: Congestion toll in Boston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fattony View Post
Sorry, maybe I missed something. What proposal is there for congestion tolls in Boston? Other than AB fantasyland?
From Carbon Free Boston Report, as discussed on p.14 upthread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
BOSTON GREEN RIBBON COMMISSION (CARBON FREE BOSTON)
From Page 56 of 120 in
Carbon Free Boston Report (https://www.greenribboncommission.or...Report-web.pdf)

Longwood-Back Bay-Downtown-Seaport

Boundaries are roughly:
WEST: The Brookline city line (Emerald Necklace) & BU Bridge
NORTH: Charles River Basin, Dam, & Harbor
SOUTH: Heath St- SW Corridor Park-I-90-W 2nd St
EAST: Reserve Channel (Pappas Way)
Michelle Wu:
https://twitter.com/wutrain/status/1027953309733343234
Quote:
Why are Uber/Lyft drivers less entitled to use city streets than any other suburban commuter coming into the city? Add fees to rideshares if you'd like but please also add congestion pricing with all funds going into improving public transit

9:03 AM - 10 Aug 2018

SEPARATELY: Congestion Tolling on State Toll Roads came-and-went over the summer:
https://www.bostonherald.com/2018/07...stion-pricing/
Quote:
Gov. Charlie Baker signaled he’s likely to put the brakes on a Senate plan to test rush-hour congestion pricing on the state’s toll roads, saying his working constituents would see it as “incredibly punitive.”

The Herald reported yesterday that a new MassDOT pilot program, included in the state budget that is now being reviewed on Beacon Hill, is aimed at easing congestion on highways by offering commuters steep discounts of as much as 25 percent for avoiding peak traffic hours. While the current plan doesn’t raise tolls, drivers have told the Herald they consider it unfair and are suspicious that it could ultimately lead to rush-hour surge pricing. A separate plan would study congestion pricing for commuter rail service.
Quote:

“A lot of people come in based on when their boss requires them to come in,” Baker said yesterday in an interview on WAAF. “They also come in based on things like dropping their kids off at school and putting their kids at day care and a whole bunch of other things. And I think for a lot of folks who don’t have the flexibility to manage their schedule, because, you know, they are working on a time clock, and stuff like that, they are going to view this as incredibly punitive.”

“My guess is that a modest difference between what you pay before 6 and what you pay after 9 and what you pay between 6 and 9 probably doesn’t make much difference at all,” Baker said. “I doubt we’re going to want to get into the business of dramatically charging people extremely different prices depending upon what time of day they come in.”
Despite the governor’s strong rhetoric, Baker’s office, when asked whether he intends to veto the measure, said he would “carefully review final legislation on his desk.”
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toll Hikes in NH - Hampton spared Smuttynose General 0 09-19-2007 02:46 PM
CURING CONGESTION: Patrick Transit and Infrastructure 1 04-09-2007 09:29 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.