archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Miscellaneous > General

General Misc. topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2007, 01:02 AM   #1
Waldorf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 536
Politics...

Well, so here it is. A forum dedicated to politics. Let the games begin...
Waldorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 05:30 AM   #2
statler
Moderator
 
statler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 7,481
Politics are stupid and any one who disagrees with me is a jerk.
statler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 08:37 AM   #3
PerfectHandle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 218
Statler...just go away. Everyone here hates you, and your opinions on politics are all stupid, stupid, STUPID!
PerfectHandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 03:40 PM   #4
DudeUrSistersHot
banished
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
im wicked right about everything


ahh, finally a place where it's appropriate to say that.
DudeUrSistersHot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 04:28 PM   #5
kz1000ps
Senior Member
 
kz1000ps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: man hat tan
Posts: 7,529
Barack Obama is the answer to everything!
kz1000ps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 08:22 PM   #6
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
What be politics?
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 08:37 PM   #7
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by statler
Politics are stupid and any one who disagrees with me is a jerk.
It all boils down to values, which are practically unchangeable for most people, and which, unfortunately, differ markedly across the country, causing perpetual discord over just about everything. So, while I cannot tell if you are being sarcastic with a hint of truth in there somewhere, regardless, I almost agree with you, my B.A. in politics aside. Politics is ALMOST stupid, and ALMOST pointless, but ultimately it boils down to what is referred to in Game Theory as the prisoner's dilemma. That is, both sides continuously bicker and try to convince the other side of the spectrum they have the right idea (even though it is essentially an exercise in futility) because if they didn't, and both sides tried to cooperate, one side would likely take advantage and the consequences could be great (regardless of which side succeeded in persuading others to hop on board). Its the same reason all night grocery stores exist. if one store stays open til ten and the other stays open until 11, store one either goes out of business or stays open until 11 as well. the end result, both stores are open all night when they could have chosen to cooperate and have all employees go home at a reasonable hour, and still earned the same profits (more when operating costs are factored in). politics is the same way, in a way. ask dude, he's always right, and seeing as how I am right here, he will concur. Politics is stupid, I don't disagree, but I think everything that goes along with it, the push, the pull, is absolutely necessary, even if exhausting. now, statler, I know this was not the type of response you counted on, but I figured I'd use your humorous comment as a launch pad for further discussion.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 10:29 PM   #8
DudeUrSistersHot
banished
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
go away
DudeUrSistersHot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2007, 10:52 PM   #9
justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Retroactive death penalty for all women who committed prenatal infanticide.

justin
justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2007, 09:06 AM   #10
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Do you know what the U.S. shares in common with Afghanistan, Cuba, China, North Korea, Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2007, 09:30 AM   #11
Waldorf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 536
Death Penalty for women who disobey their husbands?
Waldorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2007, 10:32 AM   #12
ablarc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
Do you know what the U.S. shares in common with Afghanistan, Cuba, China, North Korea, Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
What?
ablarc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2007, 12:37 PM   #13
Ron Newman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Davis Square, Somerville, MA
Posts: 8,399
Send a message via AIM to Ron Newman
Stolen national elections?
Ron Newman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2007, 05:04 PM   #14
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Ask Justin.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 07:48 AM   #15
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
New Hampshire legalizes civil unions
The governor calls the law a 'matter of conscience,' but one group vows to push for repeal.



E-mail this page

Reader Comments (below)


June 1, 2007



? By BEVERLEY WANG
The Associated Press

CONCORD, N.H. — They packed the room with cameras in hand to record the moment. And when Gov. John Lynch put down his pen, they broke into applause.

Lynch's signature Thursday morning completed a long-awaited step toward equality for New Hampshire's gay couples: civil unions.

"Sometimes you've just got to live long enough. I never thought I'd see the day," said Dawn Touzin, a board member of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition, as she wiped away tears.

"It's just been such a struggle. It shouldn't be this hard just to want to be in a relationship. This is a huge step and I'm just so proud of New Hampshire today," she said.

New Hampshire will be the fourth state to offer civil unions, and the first to do so without a court order or threat of one.

"How could any one of us look into the eyes of our neighbors, our friends, or our loved ones if we continued to deny them these basic legal protections?" Lynch said.

"I've listened and I've heard all the arguments. I do not believe that this bill threatens marriage. I believe that this is a matter of conscience and fairness."

Episcopal Bishop V. Gene Robinson was in the crowd. Although his consecration in 2003 as the first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal Church divided the worldwide Anglican Communion, Robinson and his longtime partner plan to enter a civil union.

"This is not a radical departure," he said of the bill. "This is a real confirmation of what New Hampshire has always been about: the freedom of its own citizens and fairness for everyone."

Robinson said he will not direct Episcopal priests in the state to bless same-sex unions, letting priests decide that individually. Such blessings have been another divisive issue for Episcopalians and Anglicans.

Lynch's staff arranged the signing swiftly, waiting until after 8 a.m. to announce the 9:45 a.m. ceremony. It drew a supportive crowd of Democratic lawmakers already in the Statehouse for sessions; any opponents in the room did not make themselves known.

The group Conserve N.H. later criticized the quick scheduling and vowed to push for repeal.

"We, along with the majority of our fellow citizens, are disappointed that Governor Lynch has agreed to rewrite New Hampshire's marriage laws with this unpublicized signing of the civil unions bill," said Paul Nagy, the group's chairman. "Every New Hampshire voter will be made aware of this unpopular payoff to liberal special interests."

Connecticut, Vermont, California, New Jersey, Maine and Washington have laws allowing either civil unions or domestic partnerships, and Oregon will join the list in January. Connecticut adopted civil unions without a court order two years ago, though a lawsuit was pending.

Hawaii extends certain spousal rights to same-sex couples and cohabiting heterosexual pairs. Only Massachusetts allows same-sex couples to marry.

Couples entering civil unions will have the same rights, responsibilities, and obligations as married couples. Same-sex unions from other states will be recognized if they are legal in the state where they were performed.

The bill's success was a turnabout from two years ago, when a study panel recommended against any meaningful consideration of marriage and civil unions and endorsed a constitutional ban on gay marriage. Two years in a row lawmakers defeated bills for a such a ban.

Democrats won control of the Legislature last fall for the first time in more than a century, dramatically changing the equation. Civil unions passed both Houses last month largely along party lines, and Lynch, a Democrat, promised to sign it.

The speedy progress surprised even staunch supporters.

"In the fall when the bill came through I thought, we'll start to, you know, make some headway," said state Rep. Bette Lasky of Nashua, who shepherded civil unions through the House. "I really didn't think we'd be here. I can't believe it. This to me is not routine. I do believe we made history."
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:13 AM   #16
justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Piecemeal extension of marriage rights is a blatant snub to polygamists, incestuous couples and other non-traditional family units. Should a loving union of three men and two women not have the same right to privileges and obligations of marriage?

A wealthy and influential minority has stormed the castle and immediately pulled the drawbridge back up, others be damned.

justin
justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 10:01 AM   #17
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by justin
Piecemeal extension of marriage rights is a blatant snub to polygamists, incestuous couples and other non-traditional family units. Should a loving union of three men and two women not have the same right to privileges and obligations of marriage?

A wealthy and influential minority has stormed the castle and immediately pulled the drawbridge back up, others be damned.

justin
This is a joke, right?
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 10:24 AM   #18
statler
Moderator
 
statler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 7,481
At least the small minority (which is neither as wealthy or as 'influential' as you imagine) left a road map to the castle and documented all the weak spots in the defenses.
If polygamy is your bag, go for it. Fight the good fight. Work hard to get the political, popular and legal support you need. Hammer away at the hearts and minds of people for decades. The path has been cleared, now you just have to follow it.
Just don't expect to ride in on the coat-tails of those who did all the heavy lifting. They are still too busy trying to get the rest of their family safely into the castle (and making sure not get themselves kicked back out.)
statler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 01:21 PM   #19
justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
Quote:
Originally Posted by justin
Piecemeal extension of marriage rights is a blatant snub to polygamists, incestuous couples and other non-traditional family units. Should a loving union of three men and two women not have the same right to privileges and obligations of marriage?

A wealthy and influential minority has stormed the castle and immediately pulled the drawbridge back up, others be damned.

justin
This is a joke, right?
Speaking up for the rights of ostracized minorities, be they gays, polygamists or children younger than 9 months, is no laughing matter to me, mister.

justin
justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 01:27 PM   #20
statler
Moderator
 
statler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Approaching a City
Posts: 7,481
So what you are offering is, would you say, somewhat of ... a modest proposal?
statler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
City Politics statler General 0 05-07-2007 07:20 AM
politics & elections quadratdackel General 11 08-02-2006 07:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.