Go Back > Boston's Built Environment > Transit and Infrastructure

Transit and Infrastructure All things T or civilly engineered within Boston Metro.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2010, 12:35 PM   #1
Senior Member
GW2500's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Allston
Posts: 1,034
Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

Globe, my towns, Waltham

Buses and bikes envisioned for unused track
Corridor would ease region?s traffic, planning agency says
By Matt Gunderson
Globe Correspondent / June 3, 2010
E-mail this article To: Invalid E-mail address Add a personal message80 character limit) Your E-mail: Invalid E-mail address
Sending your articleYour article has been sent. E-mail| Print| Reprints| Yahoo! Buzz| Text size ? + In an effort to ease rush hour traffic and overcrowded commuter rail parking lots, regional planners are looking into the possibility of building a side-by-side bus corridor and bike trail along a 28-mile portion of an unused rail right of way that stretches from Route 128 in Waltham to Interstate 495 in Berlin.

The so-called Mass. Central Connector could serve Berlin, Hudson, Sudbury, Waltham, Wayland, and Weston. Buses would run on a concrete strip while bicyclists would use a gravel path next to it.

The idea is still in its beginning stages but 13 area communities under the auspices of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council have authorized the council to spend money to develop a feasibility study on the connector, which would be the first of its kind in Massachusetts. The study is part of an overall look at transportation options in the Boston suburbs.

Supporters of the connector say it would cost less and provide more flexibility than light rail. It would also help leverage federal transportation dollars. Combining bus and bicycle transportation options would be beneficial to both bus riders and bicyclists, they say. The connector could be linked to the MBTA?s Fitchburg commuter rail line and to other bike trails in the region.

Planners see the possibility that the connector would serve not only the communities along the route but also nearby towns like Bolton, Marlborough, and Stow.

But the proposal probably would face resistance from some neighbors of the right of way who might object to buses whizzing along their properties. Environmental concerns, including the delicate nature of wetlands along the route, may also be an issue.

The right of way is owned by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and is already under consideration by the state as a bicycle trail.

Last month, at the urging of local leaders, the planning council began sending out surveys to gauge public opinion on the bus and bike project, said Eric Bourassa, transportation manager for the regional planning agency. The council has been hosting presentations to explain the connector at Town Halls and community centers. The cost of the project is still unknown, he said.

Bourassa said the council?s pursuit of the bus transit idea is driven by strong interest among planning officials and legislators in the idea of creating fast transit connections between the suburbs, the Route 128 corridor, and Boston. State Representative Kate Hogan, a Stow Democrat, has been key in moving the feasibility study forward, he said.

?The impetus for this is that some of us began to ask: If we are doing a rail trail, then why not do a bus way??? Bourassa said.

Bus transit service ? already in place in other areas of the country but usually done in high-density metropolitan areas ? has distinct advantages over a conventional public transit system, Bourassa said.

?It?s both cheaper and more flexible?? than a rail line, he said.

For example, if there is bridge work, for example, the bus can simply take an alternative route, which a train cannot do, he said.

Such a project could face some hurdles, however. Rail trails have been historically irksome endeavors, often facing opposition from neighbors who see trail users as a potential nuisance. Some towns, such as Stow and Maynard, have struggled with creating rail-trail paths because property owners were unwilling to allow easements across their properties.

The easement issue won?t be a concern with the 28-mile connector, however, since the entire corridor is owned by the MBTA, said Rachel Szakmary, transportation intern at the Metropolitan Planning Council. But concerns about environmental intrusions could be a source of contention, she said. In Sudbury, residents and officials have already expressed reluctance about the impact on wetlands falling within the rail trail area, she said.

The notion of a bus whizzing past people?s yards has also ignited concern in Wayland, said Sarkis Sarkisian, the town?s planner. The town?s rail trail is home to a network of scenic nature trails that interlace and crisscross with the vacant rail bed; the idea of an asphalt bus lane running through the area seems out of character to some. Also, there are questions about how frequent a bus would stop along the trail, he said. But the town hasn?t held any formal discussions on the issue, so any conclusions about public support either for or against in Wayland would be premature, Sarkisian added.

?There are a lot of questions,?? said Sarkisian. ?Is this really needed? Is it really going to provide the type of service that?? the Metropolitan Area Council ?is looking for???

In Bolton, Town Planner Jennifer Atwood Burney said she has received a few e-mails in response to the survey of the project, recently posted on the town?s website. So far, the responses to the combined bus and bike trail have been positive, she said. Over the summer, town officials will be hosting workshops to weigh public opinion on the trail proposal, she said.

?I think it might be something the public here will support,?? said Burney. ?But it?s still very new. . . We are at the exploratory phase.??

Gaining widespread public support is only half of the equation, said Bourassa. The project may also get derailed by the logistics of paving 28 miles of rail bed. One pressing concern his agency has is whether there is enough room in the right of way for a bus lane, said Bourassa.

But, so far at least, the majority of survey respondents have been supportive of the idea, Szakmary said.

?People will utilize it if you put it there,?? said Szakmary. ?It?s sort of like: If you build it, they will come.??
Come lurk with me in the shadows.
GW2500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 12:36 PM   #2
Senior Member
GW2500's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Allston
Posts: 1,034
Re: Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

You should have seen the coments section. One person said that a bike path was proposed before for the Wayland area and it was shot down b/c residents were affraid the path would be used by criminals.
Come lurk with me in the shadows.
GW2500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:05 PM   #3
Senior Member
Shepard's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,466
Re: Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

You can follow the ROW away from Waltham on Google Maps. It seems to go through the center of Hudson, but other than that doesn't hit any town centers.

Interestingly, the ROW seems to continue through Waltham to meet up with the Fitchburg line again between Waltham and Waverley by Lyman Pond. Don't know if its usable.

Overall, seems to be pretty useless as a transit corridor..
Shepard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:26 PM   #4
vanshnookenraggen's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 6,270
Re: Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

Bikes would use a gravel path? What the fuck is wrong with these people.
__________________ | |
brivx: well, my philosophy is: as designers, we make a good theater, we dont direct the play
vanshnookenraggen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
Lurker's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there now and then
Posts: 2,362
Re: Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

Suburban thinking:

Bikes = toys & mountain bikes for weekend recreation, not transportation.

I'm ardently against any transit funded rail trail which could be reactivated as a viable commuter rail/heavy/light rail route. I especially hate routes which aren't going to maintained year round or are impractical for bicycle commuting. Those should NEVER receive state or federal transportation funding since they aren't being built for transportation but instead recreation or tourism. (I'm looking at you Cape Cod/North Shore!). Pap projects also give bicycle infrastructure a bad name as evident by the beating Ray Lahood took over the recent DOT policy change to include cycling as a viable means of transit to be fostered by the Federal Government.
The above comment is entirely my delusional ramblings, and not those of my family, friends, past employers, or any of my other personalities.

"And please, I wear my Harvard Yard shorts a seersucker with crimson whales when I ghost-ride the limozine with my mangy fat cats." -Kennedy

Lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 10:22 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South End, Boston
Posts: 487
Re: Bus/ bike lane from Waltham to 495

Originally Posted by GW2500 View Post
You should have seen the coments section. One person said that a bike path was proposed before for the Wayland area and it was shot down b/c residents were affraid the path would be used by criminals.
Actually, I think it was Weston that shot it down. Just for that the T should reactivate it as an electrified commuter rail line. We'll see how they like trains whizzing by and electric catenary spoiling the scenic ROW.
Roxxma is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.