archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Outside Of Boston Metro > General Architecture & Urban Planning

General Architecture & Urban Planning All things architectural or urban in general, or withinin cities outside of Boston & Greater New England.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2017, 05:12 AM   #21
dwash59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Allston
Posts: 434
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
Or just standard building materials that we hope is protected (somehow) after being built?
The science of wallboard is well established and undisputed. As linked by someone in the Waltham thread, adding wallboard changes the time to collapse for the lumber currently being used from 6 minutes to 27 minutes[1].

[1] http://www.ul.com/global/documents/c...sue_3_2009.pdf

That isn't magic, that's science. There's a discussion to be had about whether more fire protection should be present during construction and whether buildings should have better fire protection in general, but using words like "hope" and "somehow" are not useful when we have facts.

That said, I've become a believer in the techniques used in the early 20th century for fireproofing, largely due to the fires in Allston.

12 Harvard Terrace partially collapsed while its neighbors, 8 and 16 Harvard Terrace, only sustained water and smoke damage https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...5QL/story.html

79 Brighton ave was completely gutted while its neighbors seemingly sustained no damage at all http://www.universalhub.com/2015/fou...tment-building

Those were both buildings with fire walls, physically connected to neighboring buildings.

In contrast, fire can jump like crazy between old wooden buildings. A fire in a triple decker on Mansfield jumped to several surrounding buildings http://www.universalhub.com/2013/fiv...house-three-ot

I think there's a lot to be copied from those buildings with features that contain fires. Just don't pretend that current construction is relying on "hope" and "somehow" when it is instead based on studies.
dwash59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2017, 04:06 AM   #22
WormtownNative
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Worcester
Posts: 302
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
How what's the deal on multistory wood-framed apartment buildings, such as the Cooper St ones in Waltham that seem quite the tinder boxes while under construction:



Once occupied, what enables these towers to (claim to) be significantly safer? Wallboard? Hair-trigger sprinklers? The simple act of installing doors and windows to cut down on draft?

The 1920s were big on switching to "fireproof construction" (steel, terracotta vaulting, concrete floors) for stuff that we've switched back to wood.

Is the wood in these under-construction blazes fireproofed at all? Or just standard building materials that we hope is protected (somehow) after being built?
Depends.

In addition to the UL article linked in dwash's post, here's the state's Fire Resistance Requirements

If you want ridiculousness in fireproofing, Edward Croker, Chief of the FDNY, built his retirement home entirely out of concrete. To prove its safety, he held a party at his house, and lit a closed off room on fire.

Quote:
In 1914, Croker built a completely fireproof house in Long Beach which still stands today at 116 Lindell Blvd corner of West Penn Street. This was said to be the 1st of it's kind. His house warming party was covered by the New York Times. According to the Times' story, Croker brought all of his guests to the 2nd floor of his home, where the walls, floors and rafters were made of cement, the doors, trimmings and furniture of metal and interestingly enough, the carpets and furniture coverings of asbestos. He poured a few gallons of gasoline into the room, lit a match then shut the room's metal door and dined with his guests in the next room. The fire was confined to the room and beyond a reported crack in the metal wire of the room's window, the room remained undamaged.
Quote Source

Do we need that level of ridiculousness? No, that would be prohibitively expensive. But maybe we should start questioning if the engineered stuff is all that better over true dimensional lumber.
WormtownNative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2017, 04:29 AM   #23
WormtownNative
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Worcester
Posts: 302
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwash59 View Post
The science of wallboard is well established and undisputed. As linked by someone in the Waltham thread, adding wallboard changes the time to collapse for the lumber currently being used from 6 minutes to 27 minutes[1].

[1] http://www.ul.com/global/documents/c...sue_3_2009.pdf

That isn't magic, that's science. There's a discussion to be had about whether more fire protection should be present during construction and whether buildings should have better fire protection in general, but using words like "hope" and "somehow" are not useful when we have facts.

That said, I've become a believer in the techniques used in the early 20th century for fireproofing, largely due to the fires in Allston.

12 Harvard Terrace partially collapsed while its neighbors, 8 and 16 Harvard Terrace, only sustained water and smoke damage https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...5QL/story.html

79 Brighton ave was completely gutted while its neighbors seemingly sustained no damage at all http://www.universalhub.com/2015/fou...tment-building

Those were both buildings with fire walls, physically connected to neighboring buildings.

In contrast, fire can jump like crazy between old wooden buildings. A fire in a triple decker on Mansfield jumped to several surrounding buildings http://www.universalhub.com/2013/fiv...house-three-ot

I think there's a lot to be copied from those buildings with features that contain fires. Just don't pretend that current construction is relying on "hope" and "somehow" when it is instead based on studies.
In regards to Mansfield Street linked in your post, there is a stark difference between buildings with brick firewalls between them and wood structures with short distances between them. It's apples and tomatoes.

With individual three deckers, the issue is not the wood itself, but the type of construction. Three deckers used balloon frame - that is, the same 2x4 in the wall touches both the roof joints AND the basement with no fire stops in-between. A fire that makes it into that space will quickly extend into the attic and the basement. Modern building code dictates platform construction, with fire stops on each floor, prohibiting that from occurring.

Also, in this image:



You can see the siding heavily charred and still burning in an area - this stuff is what firefighters call gasoline siding - aka Asphalt Felt siding. That also adds to the fire load, whereas vinyl siding simply melts due to heat, as seen here:



Generally speaking (not including the variable that is the occupants), the better the building is kept up, the smaller the risk of fire.
WormtownNative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 07:30 AM   #24
stellarfun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: salem ma and washington dc
Posts: 3,950
Re: Burning buildings



Aptly named Torch Tower burns for a second time in Dubai. Authorities say 30,000 buildings in the Emirates have flammable cladding.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/03/w...=10059472&te=1
__________________
A man gazing on the stars is at the mercy of the puddles in the road
stellarfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 09:08 AM   #25
datadyne007
Senior Member
 
datadyne007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chelsea, MA
Posts: 7,879
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by stellarfun View Post


Aptly named Torch Tower burns for a second time in Dubai. Authorities say 30,000 buildings in the Emirates have flammable cladding.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/03/w...=10059472&te=1
JFC.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeamusMcFly View Post
If it looks like a duck..... it's an office park.
datadyne007 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 11:48 AM   #26
DrFreewind
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 26
Re: Burning buildings

here's a gif that i found on reddit
http://i.imgur.com/ZQfhDkC.gifv
DrFreewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 03:03 PM   #27
Arlington
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Medford, MA
Posts: 2,978
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFreewind View Post
here's a gif that i found on reddit
http://i.imgur.com/ZQfhDkC.gifv
What'd they do with the insurance money from the first fire???
__________________
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 03:11 PM   #28
datadyne007
Senior Member
 
datadyne007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chelsea, MA
Posts: 7,879
Re: Burning buildings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington View Post
What'd they do with the insurance money from the first fire???
They appear to have spent it on recladding the building with the same damn flammable ACM panels.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeamusMcFly View Post
If it looks like a duck..... it's an office park.
datadyne007 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buildings I've designed. davem Design a Better Boston 84 04-18-2017 07:13 PM
Unsung Buildings Hubman Boston Architecture & Urbanism 24 04-11-2017 11:33 AM
Bridges with buildings czsz Design a Better Boston 0 07-23-2012 12:30 PM
?Revitalization? becoming a burning issue in Dudley Square philip Boston Architecture & Urbanism 19 06-06-2009 04:26 PM
Buildings that Soar ablarc General Architecture & Urban Planning 17 01-28-2009 04:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.