archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Outside Of Boston Metro > Greater New England

Greater New England All things architectural or urban in Greater New England, beyond the boundaries of Boston Metro.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2017, 04:35 PM   #41
choo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,270
Re: Lowell 2015 update

What's the rationale for no residential? Not even mixed? (I'm not familiar with Lowell but this seems to go against the grain of other small cities seeking to bring in residence and mix use)
choo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 09:25 AM   #42
palindrome
Senior Member
 
palindrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,189
Re: Lowell 2015 update

I too am a little perplexed by the no residential reasoning.

Is there any reason this area needs a master developer? Can the city not just go parcel by parcel?
palindrome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 12:19 PM   #43
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrome View Post
I too am a little perplexed by the no residential reasoning.

Is there any reason this area needs a master developer? Can the city not just go parcel by parcel?
I can only guess myself, as someone who lived in Lowell for 8 years relatively near this location.

My guess is that the city feels that the downtown and surrounding area is already fairly residential. Most of the area within the canals (at least near the hamilton) already hosts nice loft buildings for residential.

Like a lot of other formerly great cities and current gateway cities Lowell probably believes in revitalizing the downtown with a relevant mix (office) that can draw people into the city.

Lowell already has some major employers, but they live on the periphery. If their vision is to revitalize, I understand their reasoning.
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 03:03 PM   #44
stefalarchitect
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 418
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Small update on Lowell:

UMass is investing quite a bit on their facilities recently.

Yesterday they announced they're beginning a 2 year renovation and addition to two of their eight engineering/science buildings, totaling ~$80 million. Yesterday Gov. Baker also announced an additional $10 million in funding for the renovation of a UML Property downtown. (Boston Business Journal)

This past spring they officially opened a new business center:



stefalarchitect is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2017, 09:19 AM   #45
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverend_paco View Post
I can only guess myself, as someone who lived in Lowell for 8 years relatively near this location.

My guess is that the city feels that the downtown and surrounding area is already fairly residential. Most of the area within the canals (at least near the hamilton) already hosts nice loft buildings for residential.

Like a lot of other formerly great cities and current gateway cities Lowell probably believes in revitalizing the downtown with a relevant mix (office) that can draw people into the city.

Lowell already has some major employers, but they live on the periphery. If their vision is to revitalize, I understand their reasoning.
I understand their reasoning too. Lowell probably doesn't want to just be a bedroom. They want independent significance, and that comes from commercial presence. I think the central cities are looking to do the opposite, increase residential, so they can become 24/7 places. It depends on the city's existing perspective/role in the larger metro area I think, and as an outsider Lowell appears to be mostly bedroom (despite its obvious local service establishments and probably a few other notable commercial presences).

Another reason could be that residential development is often perceived as having a negative impact on school costs whereas commercial development pays taxes without adding to spending too much.

Lastly, if this is city owned land, there could be greater environmental cleanup costs associated with a residential use, which would decrease the offering price for the land from a residential developer, or increase the pre-sale burden on the city. Just speculating but it seems like that could be a factor given location.
__________________
I like urbanism, big and small, near and far.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2017, 09:22 AM   #46
Patrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,280
Re: Lowell 2015 update

PS the UMass buildings look great. Thanks for posting. Reminds me a bit of the Muskie School in Portland (not really similar, but for some reason it made me think of it). http://multifiles.pressherald.com/up...school_USM.jpg
__________________
I like urbanism, big and small, near and far.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2017, 04:35 PM   #47
iamdjmichael
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 87
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Has anyone heard of or seen plans for the Lupoli Co 20 story tower in the HCD? http://richardhowe.com/2017/10/08/lo...ctober-8-2017/
iamdjmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2017, 09:05 PM   #48
FK4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,945
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamdjmichael View Post
Has anyone heard of or seen plans for the Lupoli Co 20 story tower in the HCD? http://richardhowe.com/2017/10/08/lo...ctober-8-2017/
great updates. thx. hopefully will happen.
FK4 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 04:16 PM   #49
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverend_paco View Post
Holy Smokes. That would be beautiful, but my internal skeptic thinks that there is no way a $900K condo would sell down there. I say this as a huge Lowell fan (I still own two condos there and lived there for eight years).
Did some sleuthing and found a proposal on the Lowell city site (kinda a PNF) for this project. I'll grab some screenshots later, but here is the PDF.

https://www.lowellma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2267
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 08:13 PM   #50
stefalarchitect
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 418
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverend_paco View Post
Did some sleuthing and found a proposal on the Lowell city site (kinda a PNF) for this project. I'll grab some screenshots later, but here is the PDF.

https://www.lowellma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2267
Renderings from the architect's website:

stefalarchitect is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 05:58 AM   #51
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by stefalarchitect View Post
Renderings from the architect's website:

12 Stories. 66 Units.


Also:



Showing ~4K SF for a first floor restaurant:





And just in case anyone wants to know where this is, it would replace the L-shaped building in the middle of this screenshot:


https://goo.gl/maps/8pvX4XnTwMk
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 01:15 PM   #52
Brad Plaid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 826
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Good project but those cornices are ridiculous. Get rid of them and the design is a decent bit of modernism. They are grossly over-sized and not at all necessary. That kind of traditionalist detail has no place here.
Brad Plaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 02:05 PM   #53
Lrfox
Senior Member
 
Lrfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,232
Re: Lowell 2015 update

^Agreed. And is the small surface lot REALLY necessary? I mean, there's no way that's enough parking for the while building. And it's on the most prominent corner on the site in terms of pedestrian traffic.

Also, looks like that L-shaped building is already gone when I look at google maps: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Lo...!4d-71.3161718
Lrfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 04:07 PM   #54
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lrfox View Post
^Agreed. And is the small surface lot REALLY necessary?
I totally agree, but I wonder if they actually own the lot. The diagram shows there being a property line between the building and the parking lot.
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 04:14 PM   #55
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverend_paco View Post
I totally agree, but I wonder if they actually own the lot. The diagram shows there being a property line between the building and the parking lot.
Yup. The lot parcel 1950-11 is owned by someone else:



The next two lots down (1950-1 and 1695-21) Davidson are owned by the developer but not the parking lot.
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 04:57 PM   #56
kingofsheeba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Charlestown
Posts: 241
Re: Lowell 2015 update

It's from last month, but the Lowell Justice Center has been topped off. This building is f'n massive. Easily the most visible building in the Mill City. I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, it'll be able to house other courts and consolidate them to one convenient place. On the contrary, a building of that size gives me the feeling that it'll just be a massive criminal justice factory with the poor, non-whites and disabled on the receiving end of a gavel. A courthouse shouldn't be this monolithic but it is.

http://www.lowellsun.com/news/ci_314...justice-center
Quote:
The new Lowell Justice Center will provide state-of-the-art facilities for the Superior, District, Probate & Family, Juvenile, and Housing Courts of Middlesex County, according to officials.

The building will provide new space for the Middlesex County Registry of Deeds, District Attorney, and a resource center for self-represented litigants. The 3.

3-acre site will have 17 courtrooms. The estimated completion date is fall 2019.
kingofsheeba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 02:47 PM   #57
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingofsheeba View Post
It's from last month, but the Lowell Justice Center has been topped off. This building is f'n massive. Easily the most visible building in the Mill City. I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, it'll be able to house other courts and consolidate them to one convenient place. On the contrary, a building of that size gives me the feeling that it'll just be a massive criminal justice factory with the poor, non-whites and disabled on the receiving end of a gavel. A courthouse shouldn't be this monolithic but it is.






reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2018, 02:34 PM   #58
reverend_paco
Senior Member
 
reverend_paco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 306
Re: Lowell 2015 update



New residential/shops near commuter rail on Thorndike Street, done by Sal Lupoli.

https://www.thorndikeexchange.com/
reverend_paco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2018, 03:08 PM   #59
Portlander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Where else?
Posts: 462
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Thanks for the update reverend, has the "One" project on Merrimack Street broken ground yet?
Portlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2018, 04:18 PM   #60
stefalarchitect
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 418
Re: Lowell 2015 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portlander View Post
Thanks for the update reverend, has the "One" project on Merrimack Street broken ground yet?
No, but there is a fence around the site. I'm not sure if that's related or if the fence has been there for a while, though.
stefalarchitect is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Burlington Update.... SHAZBAT73 Greater New England 14 09-09-2016 06:05 PM
MBTA Winter 2015: Failure and Recovery Jahvon09 Transit and Infrastructure 1222 01-25-2016 10:06 PM
Photo of the Day, Boston Style: Part VIII (2015) kz1000ps Boston Architecture & Urbanism 183 12-29-2015 04:51 PM
Boston's Taxi Fleet to be 100% Hybrid by 2015 Lrfox Transit and Infrastructure 15 05-04-2015 10:29 PM
Portsmouth Update's goody Greater New England 1 11-03-2006 01:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.