archBOSTON.org

Go Back   archBOSTON.org > Boston's Built Environment > Design a Better Boston

Design a Better Boston Are you disappointed with the state of Boston's current architecture/development? Think you have a better idea? Post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-25-2016, 03:53 PM   #21
tysmith95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,060
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSTH View Post
This is on the harbor with great views of downtown, charlestown and the Tobin
[/IMG]
Are those apartment buildings?
tysmith95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2016, 05:06 PM   #22
CantabAmager
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 216
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

RE: that Mass Ave building that looks like the spaceship from Independence day

I think the stretch of Huntington between Copley and the Mass Ave intersection is one of the best examples for trying to understand and assess urban renewal and/or redevelopment in general. The West End, Scollay Square, South Cove, NY Streets, etc... constitute the more extreme examples, but Huntington represents to me a more complicated (and probably more appropriate for current discussion) picture of the time.

Huntington used to have a more clear, contiguous connection with Copley. As can be seen here:

Looking southwest from Copley


Looking east over railyards (Huntington to lower right):


Looking toward Hunt. x Mass Ave (from north to south, then south to north)



Street level, looking southwest from Harcourt St


A lot of the razed buildings towards the intersection with Mass Ave (including the spaceship building I think) were part of the Mother Church campus renewal program; the Church owned most of the peripheral properties which they sold off to developers to the defray the costs or turned over to the BRA. I don't personally like a lot of what has been put up since, but as has been mentioned, a lot of the newer buildings are functional replacements, they're larger, greater FAR in many cases, have shops on the street, generate more tax money for the city than what they replaced. I think an unbroken street-wall of 4 and 5-story, 1890-1920-era apartments is a great environment and better in that it tied Huntington more closely to the Back Bay; I think Symphony Towers, those other gray ones by W. Newton, the motel, etc are miserable replacements from an aesthetic perspective. I think the reflecting pool at the CSC is nice, but it's size is superfluous and that old block of abutting apts could've meshed perfectly well and I think that Copley Square looked better with the SS Pierce Building (see bottom)

But many of these buildings certainly have their benefits and opposition based mostly in aesthetic preference is dangerous (except in the case of the motel - fuck that place). Unlike a lot of the other areas whacked upside the head by urban renewal mania with objectively detrimental results, Huntington's experience is lot more complicated, more challenging for anyone else like me that likes the older stock but has no interest in being a martyr for it; it's probably one that deserves more attention as its a good place to look when trying to put a lot of the more recent developments in perspective: what's important? Function or aesthetics or size or open space? What's the balance?

SS. Pierce Building (center and left) - Copley Place didn't displace this building fwiw, it was torn down well before.

Last edited by CantabAmager; 05-25-2016 at 05:27 PM.
CantabAmager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2016, 08:51 PM   #23
CSTH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,519
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by tysmith95 View Post
Are those apartment buildings?
Public housing
CSTH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2016, 11:58 PM   #24
Charlie_mta
Senior Member
 
Charlie_mta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,125
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Sweet.

I want me some of that public housing.
Charlie_mta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 05:04 PM   #25
Digital_Islandboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 361
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by oyhimylm View Post
That building is rather ugly, but I don't think it's all that bad from a functional point of view. The "sidewalk" here is gigantic, the ground level is entirely retail, the overhang provides shelter from inclement weather, and despite its impermeable appearance, there are several pedestrian cut throughs that keep it from actually being so.
I was told by someone who was looking for apartments in the area that the inside looks very nice despite what outside looks like.
Digital_Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2016, 06:43 AM   #26
Suffolk 83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South End
Posts: 1,810
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

This thing on Charles st.

https://www.google.com/maps/search/o...7i13312!8i6656

Probably couldnt be too tall with the shadows on the common thing and the South Cove residents would probably go crazy
Suffolk 83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2016, 11:24 AM   #27
West
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 736
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suffolk 83 View Post
This thing on Charles st.

https://www.google.com/maps/search/o...7i13312!8i6656

Probably couldnt be too tall with the shadows on the common thing and the South Cove residents would probably go crazy
Doubtful it's going away. Assessor's site shows Boston Edison as owner, and it looks absolutely like a substation sort of building. Unless NStar has some alternative location for whatever equipment is in there - and they so rarely do have such alternatives in dense urban areas - this will be a fixture for some time to come. There's even some equipment in the parking area, which suggests that they've already outgrown the building itself.
West is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2016, 09:56 AM   #28
Scalziand
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 450
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Problem: the blank wall of 45 Province that everyone hates.

Solution: a needle tower on the site of the Bosworth street annex of the Omni Parker Hotel, just large enough to block the blank wall.
__________________
Shadows no longer exist. They will henceforth be known as shade.
Scalziand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2016, 10:27 AM   #29
bigpicture7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 1,300
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scalziand View Post
Problem: the blank wall of 45 Province that everyone hates.

Solution: a needle tower on the site of the Bosworth street annex of the Omni Parker Hotel, just large enough to block the blank wall.
Yes. That would be awesome.

Also, a question for the panel that I'm sure has been discussed somewhere but I can't seem to find it - can someone enlighten me as to why that blank wall on 45 Province is there in the first place? I poked around the 45 Province thread and couldn't seem to find an explanation (other than people complaining about it). I was a semi-frequent viewer of this forum back then (before I joined) but can't seem to recall learning about this.
bigpicture7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2016, 11:46 AM   #30
citylover94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: White River Jct.
Posts: 1,067
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

I believe it is part of the elevator/utilities core and as such had to be a solid wall.
citylover94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2016, 02:03 PM   #31
bobthebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 360
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpicture7 View Post
Yes. That would be awesome.

Also, a question for the panel that I'm sure has been discussed somewhere but I can't seem to find it - can someone enlighten me as to why that blank wall on 45 Province is there in the first place? I poked around the 45 Province thread and couldn't seem to find an explanation (other than people complaining about it). I was a semi-frequent viewer of this forum back then (before I joined) but can't seem to recall learning about this.
If you look at the parcel for 45 Province, it is a very narrow lot between province & chapman st. There isn't enough room to put the core in the middle of the building. If you did that, you would likely lose 1-2 units on each floor. Now they could have put the core on the opposite side of the building, but ten you would have wound up with a blank wall on the street vs what is for all intents and purposes an alleyway.

You could have put the core at one or both ends of the building, but my guess is that would not have been as attractive an option financially.
bobthebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2016, 02:34 PM   #32
bigpicture7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 1,300
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Thanks citylover and Bob...but the question still becomes by they went with chintzy blank cladding like that. Plenty of buildings employ glass curtainwalls over "bank" areas of the building...some have entire mechanical floors wrapped in curtainwall with opaque material behind it. They could have finished off this side with a curtain wall and even considered a cool lighting display behind the glass.
bigpicture7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 06:37 AM   #33
JeffDowntown
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Cove
Posts: 2,493
Re: Which building should be redeveloped

Quote:
Originally Posted by West View Post
Doubtful it's going away. Assessor's site shows Boston Edison as owner, and it looks absolutely like a substation sort of building. Unless NStar has some alternative location for whatever equipment is in there - and they so rarely do have such alternatives in dense urban areas - this will be a fixture for some time to come. There's even some equipment in the parking area, which suggests that they've already outgrown the building itself.
That electric substation services most of Chinatown and the near South End. It is not going anywhere.
__________________
Jeff H.
Downtown, South Cove
JeffDowntown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A redeveloped cleveland circle palindrome Design a Better Boston 69 10-14-2015 10:41 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.