archBOSTON.org

archBOSTON.org (http://www.archboston.org/community/index.php)
-   Development Projects (http://www.archboston.org/community/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Small Infill Development Thread (http://www.archboston.org/community/showthread.php?t=4522)

dbartman 03-29-2013 08:12 AM

Small Infill Development Thread
 
I'm a Senior Planner for the City of Somerville. I've been doing some research into smaller scale infill buildings (ie. cottages, houses, triple deckers, duplexes, rowhouses, and small multi-plexes). I was hoping the rest of you might be interested in helping me build a thread of images that illustrate recent infill construction of these building types...examples from across the board (the good, the bad, and even the ugly). One of the objectives is to find examples of contemporary design that is at least harmonious with neighboring housing (obviously open to interpretation).

To start things off here's some pictures I've collected.

http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/507/dfaqv8.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/8...quesstunit.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/850/vpvpqu.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/845/lbe3b1a44m0x.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/5...db1d44w15o.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/171/la7db1d44w0o.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/5...emorialdr1.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/706/grant3ext01.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/2...ks47ext011.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/11/grant5ext01.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/442/grant3ext02.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/689/grant5ext02.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/706/grant5ext03.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/850/grant5ext04.jpg
http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/707/65947942.jpg

Thanks in advance for the help.

Brad Plaid 03-29-2013 10:52 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Well Bart you certainly have a good start on the ugly (and the dull.) The Harvard infill is the least offensive of the bunch but that isn't saying much. Were these developers all 80 year old grandmothers? Would seem so looking at this stuff. Sadly, the majority of today's new housing construction has toxic levels of quaintness and by no means do these even come close to the worst of what's out there.

Hutchison 03-29-2013 11:02 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
I'd imagine most of the development in south boston would fall into this category?

George_Apley 03-29-2013 11:12 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
The infill condo/apartment 3-story @ Summer and School outside Union Sq in Somerville looks pretty good, although it's only partially done. I can try to snap a picture of it sometime.

It is a shame that a retail space was lost by that redevelopment though. May have been vacant for a long time (I don't know, I'm fairly new to Union) but retail space will definitely be in high demand in Union a few years from now.

George_Apley 03-29-2013 11:15 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Also; they are not new infill, but I've always loved the short strip of brick rowhouses on Summer opp Vinyl. Unusual for that part of Somerville, but I wish there were more of them. They look great. Love to see things like this built more often.

http://goo.gl/maps/9xkgE

AmericanFolkLegend 03-29-2013 12:33 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Bartman, If you stroll through this thread you'll find a little bit of everything (the good, the bad, and the ugly).

Btw, I think some of the examples you posted look quite nice. Reasonable construction costs and a nod to their context count for something. Don't mind Brad Plaid - if it isn't some avant garde expression on Modernism, he doesn't want to see it.

jass 03-29-2013 01:20 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Would Sommerville allow this?

http://popville.wpengine.netdna-cdn....4488490346.jpg

blade_bltz 03-29-2013 01:25 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
^ LOL. That reminds me, what ever happened to that North End infill that allegedly started last year?

Quote:

The infill condo/apartment 3-story @ Summer and School outside Union Sq in Somerville looks pretty good, although it's only partially done. I can try to snap a picture of it sometime.
Yes please!

Hutchison 03-29-2013 01:36 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
I'd also suggest the portland thread for lots of infill sized development

http://archboston.org/community/show...t=944&page=103

DZH22 03-29-2013 01:56 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Every building U/C in Boston for the past 3 years belongs in this category

Brad Plaid 03-29-2013 02:05 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AmericanFolkLegend (Post 170059)
Btw, I think some of the examples you posted look quite nice. Reasonable construction costs and a nod to their context count for something. Don't mind Brad Plaid - if it isn't some avant garde expression on Modernism, he doesn't want to see it.

Avant garde is always welcome but background modernist is good too. A less "regressive" architect could use the same materials at the same cost and come up with a contextual design that is far more interesting than any of those examples.

Brad Plaid 03-29-2013 02:12 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jass (Post 170072)

Brooklyn? You can look at it as out of scale or look at it as creating a new, denser scale. More dense scale please.

czsz 03-29-2013 03:10 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
^ DC.

If you want good examples of infill in the US, look at Chicago and Philadelphia.

stellarfun 03-29-2013 03:49 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by czsz (Post 170095)
^ DC.

If you want good examples of infill in the US, look at Chicago and Philadelphia.

If that's in DC, has to be in a fringe neighborhood where architectural review boards have no sway.

Recent examples of sway:
New commercial office building.
Quote:

Mr. Krieger noted the multiple planes of the facade design and asked about the depth of the design. Mr. Goldstein [the architect] responded that the facades would have an eight–inch depth between the outer surfaces of the materials. He confirmed that the white highlights on the facades would be the lighter color of precast concrete rather than an additional projecting element.

Ms. Plater–Zyberk asked for clarification of the varying one– and two–story grouping of the facade elements, and the relationship of the contrasting bays on the north and east facades; Mr. Goldstein indicated the intended consistency of details throughout the design. Ms. Plater–Zyberk questioned the apparently inconsistent use of white precast highlights on the eastern end of the north facade, where the building plane steps back, in comparison to the similar accent on the single–plane west facade; Mr. Krieger agreed that the detailing is problematic. Ms. Plater–Zyberk suggested adding a vertical accent on the north to terminate the highlighted facade at the setback corner in a manner comparable to the west facade.
Private residence
Quote:

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to concept design for new dormer windows and front passage metal gate, one–story addition with polygonal room at west side yard provided stair landing is not attached to chamfered corner, rectangular oriel and new stair on north wall, and new second–story windows no larger than existing windows as suggested in drawings dated 17 December 2012. File new submission of construction drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.
Harvard University, existing building.
Quote:

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for new gray–green slate roof to match existing with random width coursing and loose laid vertical gaps, and lead coated copper flashing. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re–submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit

itchy 03-29-2013 05:14 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Plaid (Post 170038)
Sadly, the majority of today's new housing construction has toxic levels of quaintness and by no means do these even come close to the worst of what's out there.

"You'll have to excuse Brad - he's going through his 'avant garde' phase these days. And in 3 months he'll be 16 and we'll get him his learner's permit, won't we, Brad?"

jass 03-30-2013 12:56 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Plaid (Post 170090)
Brooklyn? You can look at it as out of scale or look at it as creating a new, denser scale. More dense scale please.

DC.

Reminds me of that building on the north side of the common that also pops out like that.

briv 03-30-2013 01:31 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
That's what instantly sprang to my mind as well. It's not so crazy:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99...skyscraper.jpg

I really like this thread. Ablarc would've been all over it.

JohnAKeith 03-30-2013 10:39 AM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
461 Park Drive. Unfortunately, not a great photo.

http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/wp-co...udio-condo.jpghttp://photos3.zillow.com/p_d/IS-3j600161agyl.jpg

citylover94 04-05-2013 04:40 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by briv (Post 170166)
That's what instantly sprang to my mind as well. It's not so crazy:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99...skyscraper.jpg

I really like this thread. Ablarc would've been all over it.

I thought of that building too and then I looked closer and realized the one on Beacon Hill is about twice as tall as the new one in DC. The row houses around the one in DC are only 2 or 3 stories it looks like versus five or six story ones on Beacon Hill.

jass 04-05-2013 10:57 PM

Re: Small Infill Development Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by briv (Post 170166)
That's what instantly sprang to my mind as well. It's not so crazy:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99...skyscraper.jpg

I really like this thread. Ablarc would've been all over it.

Anyone ever been in there?

The floors look super short.

Is there an elevator?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.