Recent content by real_EthanHunt

Correct, and that all went down under prior administrations, city and state.

but the 'zoning' process for this would be Article 80 Large Project Review (as with anything over 50KSF). there arent parking minimums on any of the land uses. zoning doesnt have a say in parking for these projects. there are maximums in place, not minimums, and there has been for over 20...

https://www.mbta.com/projects/silver-line-extension-slx-alternatives-analysis

what is the address/location of the EEI tower site that also sold? there will be a thread for 83 leo before end of spring...

The bike lane is not outboard of the sidewalk. How are you getting that (especially from a picture that is structure only)? It's already half built on the Charlestown side between the road and sidewalk. there wasn't enough room on the N End side to finish it with temp bridge in place...

the picture is of the east side, poster wasnt referring to the temporary bridge.

It would be in the recordings from the recent BPDA meetings. Otherwise look here https://www.boston.gov/education/white-stadium#faq Then click on transportation

its #1. the article is 5 months old, there have been multiple meetings since then where they have committed to it for game days. didnt mean to make you feel called out, was just trying to keep information current. you are definitely correct that they were noncommittal during the fall meetings...

this x1000. I golf there on weekends and there is always music blasting from different areas of the park that carry sound through the park. its a unique golf experience thats for sure and adds to the experience in my opinion. this is not correct. the City has committed to having the team...

The T12 of BNRD is serving this. Direct connection from Andrew to Seaport along a D St bus corridor without the circuitous route.

only most of the residents that speak at these meetings do not like the BRT lanes.

I wasn't commenting on what was next, I was discussing why the east parcel plan was originally 3 buildings but is now only 1. The residential building is on the west parcel.

thats why there is only 1 building in the plan now. 'near' the tunnels, not on them or supports through the stations as the previous 3 building iteration would have required.

The IAG reviewed the coop agreement awhile back. Nothing changed since then and it was then executed. Some on the IAG need to understand the A in the acronym. They advise, not decide. Not liking the agreement is not the same as not reviewing the agreement. There were never 'ramps'. The...

the xpressway is the extra 25 to 45 minutes?