archBOSTON ARCHIVE Forum Index archBOSTON ARCHIVE
March 10, 2005 - May 20, 2006
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

city analogies

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    archBOSTON ARCHIVE Forum Index -> Architecture & Urban Planning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
patrick0000



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 2570

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:02 am    Post subject: city analogies Reply with quote

Well, I am procrastinating, yet again, and since I make pointless posts almost all day long, I figured this wouldn't be much different.

I have some loose city analogies that I have been turning over in my head, and I'd be interested to hear your take on them...

1. Lewiston is to Portland what concord is to Manchester
.....in terms of distance, size, and dependence, obviously not attractiveness.

2. at least in some ways, which I will list below, Hartford is to Providence what Portland is to Manchester.
.....Hartford has more high rises, and is more of a financial center, but has a far smaller population. Just like Portland compared to Manchester.

3. Hartford is to NYC what Manchester is to Boston, what Portland is to Boston, and what Burlington is to Montreal. and Rutland is to Burlington what Lewiston and concord are to Portland and Manchester, respectively.

4. This may be a stretch...Boston is to NYC what Manchester is to Boston.

like I said, I'd be interested in reactions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matt



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 840

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i do this all the time in my head. Much better than school work.

1. yes

2. I'm not sure about...is just seems that there is something going on in connecticut that I don't understand, as in...how much of it is really a big NYC suburb. It doesn't seem like any of those cities full stand on their own, in my opinion.

Sort of like what I was saying about manchester v. boston a while back...Portland seems like a much more self-sufficient entity, while manchester has grown into in the northern terminus of the boston metro spawl, a strong satellite city.

That's sort of how I see hartford...something tells me the density of the smaller towns, especially south, is pretty intense. Whereas Providence is more self-sufficient, relatively speaking. And, you know that I don't put a whole lot of value in the number of highrises a city has!

I'd switch the analogy around.. hartford:Providece::manchester:Portland

3. manchester to boston, not portland...due to this

4. With that same sort of thought...I wouldn't feel that manchester:boston::boston:NYC works....I'd replace manchester with portland. I would never consider anything in manchester a "little boston"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
patrick0000



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 2570

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ehh, just some ideas I was playing with. I figured they'd be way off. but it is interesting to think about stuff like this...the parallels between major cities and their satellites can be fascinating...

I just meant the Hartford:providence::Portland:Manchester analogy based on the fact that hart and prov are in the same class of city (size wise) as are Portland and Manchester (despite the population gap)...hart is smaller than prov, but has more high rises (like Portland) and is a financial center (like Portland) and prov is a cultural center (where manch, as much as i hate to admit it, has a better museum, and an arena, new restaurants, etc...) manch is a mill city undergoing somewhat of a renaissance, sorta like Manchester is.

anyway, just some ideas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matt



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 840

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, who knows...like everything else, it's where you place your values. Like you can be down on your hometown, as you know, I can get down on mine too...probably not seeing it objectively.

I do think these comparisons are important, however, because you can see what works and what does not in terms of urban planning for the future. I suppose it wouldn't hurt for a city like portland to see what is working in manchester, regardless of whether or not it is a 'satellite' city or not. Getting improved cultural centers, for example, is a great goal for any city.

I'd be interested in hearing what the other guys think, too..you and I tend to be very explicit about our opinions! Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
patrick0000



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 2570

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

haha this is true. i think the cultural center in portland is about to shut down and be turned into something else.

anyway, have you guys heard about how much development is kicking off in providence? it is mind boggling. I'm sure most already know, but there are like two 17-19 story buildings, a 25 or something, or maybe a 31, and they have a new tallest under construction. pretty impressive. hartford, too, is booming.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    archBOSTON ARCHIVE Forum Index -> Architecture & Urban Planning All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group